Do you mean we should take xc_sort.sql from older release?
---
Koichi Suzuki
On 2013/05/15, at 13:22, Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...> wrote:
> Again in this case, the right fix is to use the standard EXPLAIN form EXPLAIN (verbose, num_nodes off, nodes off, costs off).
>
> What I don't understand is how come these changes appeared suddenly?
>
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Koichi Suzuki <koi...@gm...> wrote:
> Hello;
>
> This failure was caused by the following:
>
> 1. Now FQS pushes down order by and there're no sort at coordinator. Current regression did not reflect this.
>
> 2. Regression test changed the datanode name. Current regression did not reflect this.
>
> Enclosed is a fix.
>
> Regards;
> ----------
> Koichi Suzuki
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform delivers complete
> security visibility with the essential security capabilities. Easily and
> efficiently configure, manage, and operate all of your security controls
> from a single console and one unified framework. Download a free trial.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/alienvault_d2d
> _______________________________________________
> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
> Pos...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Wishes,
> Ashutosh Bapat
> EntepriseDB Corporation
> The Postgres Database Company
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform delivers complete
> security visibility with the essential security capabilities. Easily and
> efficiently configure, manage, and operate all of your security controls
> from a single console and one unified framework. Download a free trial.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/alienvault_d2d_______________________________________________
> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
> Pos...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
|
