On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Michael Paquier
<mic...@gm...> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Xiong Wang <wan...@gm...> wrote:
>>
>> I wrote a simple patch which will show distribution information when you
>> use \d tablename command.
>
> I vote no for that with ¥d. I agree it is useful, but it makes the output
> inconsistent with vanilla Postgres. And I am sure it creates many failures
> in regression tests. It has been discussed before to use either a new
> command with a word or a letter we'll be sure won't be in conflict with
> vanilla now and at some point in the future. Something like "¥distrib"
> perhaps?
How about (yet another) GUC, such as conform_pg_output ? If set to
true, commands will print only pg style information. But if set to
false, various commands may print a lot more XC-specific information.
The regression can be run with the GUC turned ON. I'm not sure what
should be the default. But it will make a lot of sense to keep it OFF
by default. This way, those who are coming from PG world don't need to
learn new commands.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee
|
