On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:27 PM, David E. Wheeler <da...@ju...>wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2014, at 11:14 PM, Ashutosh Bapat <
> ash...@en...> wrote:
>
> > It depends what APIs in Postgres are being used in PostGIS. We have
> modified a quite a few internal functions and structures e.g.
> standard_ProcessUtility() to work in cluster environment. Using those
> functions would break the object linkages. But anything which is SQL
> compatible with 10.1 will work against PGXC 2.0 if we get to catch up with
> PG by then. One may not need to modify the code in such cases, but would
> require to build the extension or binary again.
>
> Well, that seems a rather long way off, and RPMs can be renamed at that
> time, if appropriate. In the meantime, I think using the "xc11" suffix as I
> proposed is the way to go. Agreed?
>
>
That looks good.
> Best,
>
> David
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
|
