From: Koichi S. <koi...@gm...> - 2014-10-20 09:57:32
|
Does your configuration offer all the failover, including GTM, datanode and coordinator? --- Koichi Suzuki 2014-10-20 18:33 GMT+09:00 Mason Sharp <ms...@tr...>: > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:19 AM, 鈴木 幸市 <ko...@in...> wrote: >> >> In HA, I don’t think Corosync/Pacemaker can deal with XC configuration, >> where many components are interrelated and they are HA-aware. At present, >> Corosync/Pacemaker works well for HA-unaware components with master/slave >> pair model. XC configuration is more complicated than what they can deal >> with. >> > > We have configured with Corosync/Pacemaker. It is complex, however. > > > > -- > Mason Sharp > > TransLattice - http://www.translattice.com > Clustered and Distributed Database Solutions > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. > Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. > Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. > Take corrective actions from your mobile device. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho > _______________________________________________ > Postgres-xc-general mailing list > Pos...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-general > |