From: Michael P. <mic...@gm...> - 2014-06-16 11:32:55
|
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 6:31 PM, 鈴木 幸市 <ko...@in...> wrote: > As much as I heard, their benchmark in 2012 was not correct. I had some talk with PGECons people and they made several correction on it. > --- > Koichi Suzuki > > 2014/06/16 13:42、wormwang <wor...@ya...> のメール: > >> Why the perf result of PostgreSQL decreased from 2084 to 910 at 2012 to 2013 at the Pgbench results? >> and Why the 4XCnode is much more than 4 times faster than 1 PostgreSQL? Btw, it is hard to give to those tests much value without more details about: - The hardware used. How many CPUs? How much memory? - The settings of server, like postgresql.conf. How many shared buffers? Was catalog and/or pgbench data cached? pre-warmed perhaps? - Structure of the cluster (1Co/1Da per server, all at the same place?) -- Michael |