Re: [Postgres-xc-general] Postgres XC and resiliency.

[Tim U. <tim...@gm...>]

It would be ideal if shards could be distributed amongst the data nodes in
a redundant fashion. Perhaps with limits like at least three nodes, no more
than five nodes etc.

Thanks.


On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:59 PM, 鈴木 幸市 <ko...@in...> wrote:

>  Not thorough document of everything on it.   So far, HA configuration
> needs integration with other software like Pacemaker and has far more
> variety of configuration to describe in a simple document.
>
>  To configure XC with slaves and to failover the nodes, following
> material will be helpful.
>
>  Pgxc_ctl: Postgres-XC configuration and operation tool.   Reference
> maulal will be at
> http://postgres-xc.sourceforge.net/docs/1_2_1/pgxc-ctl.html
> pgxc_ctl sample configuration and sample operation scenario will be at
> ---
> https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/postgres-xc/index.php?title=PGOpen2013_Postgres_Open_2013
>
>  Regards;
> ---
> Koichi Suzuki
>
>  2014/04/08 8:20、Tim Uckun <tim...@gm...> のメール：
>
>  Is there a document someplace which explains how to achieve high
> availability with PGXC?  For example do you set up two clusters and
> replicate between them? Do you replicate every data node separately?  Is
> there a way to "raid" the data so that it exists in multiple nodes so you
> can safely lose a data node?
>
>  I know you can specify that a table be present in all the nodes but I am
> guessing it won't really get you much if you choose every table to be on
> every node.
>
>  Thanks.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Put Bad Developers to Shame
> Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration
> Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment
> Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees_______________________________________________
> Postgres-xc-general mailing list
> Pos...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-general
>
>
>