Re: [Postgres-xc-general] What is the minimum server requirement for pgxc

[Juned K. <jkh...@gm...>]

Hi Mason

That is correct mailing list helped me a lot, and i am very thankful to
everyone.

Yeah earlier i have asked about this requirement and received good response
and advices
but the point which you have mentioned that is noticeable, i can not ignore
that

i should think about this many points before moving ahead.

Regards,
Juned Khan




On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Mason Sharp <ms...@tr...>wrote:

>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Juned Khan <jkh...@gm...> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mason,
>>
>>
>> OK, that is not too much, regular PostgreSQL could work. Are a lot of
>> those reads? Perhaps you can use PostgreSQL with streaming replication and
>> do reads from a local hot standby, but writing to a remote master. It would
>> have to be ok though that writes are not permitted if the network is down,
>> as well as accepting that for those reads it may not be the latest version
>> of the row/tuple, and the writes will incur latency. The other things you
>> could do is, if your writes are mainly inserts is to write to local tables
>> when the network is down, and then write these to the remote master once it
>> is up again
>>
>> for this scenario what application i should use, what powerful and stable
>> application you do suggest to achieve this ?
>>
>
> I don't know enough about your application, I was trying to give you some
> ideas for possible database architectures, though you may have some work
> ahead of you to put it in place if there is a lot of customization. People
> on the email list have been trying to help you over the last few weeks.
> Your company may want to consider bringing in an outside consulting company
> that can sign an NDA, meet with you, and work with you on a solution.
>
> --
> Mason Sharp
>
> TransLattice - http://www.translattice.com
> Distributed and Clustered Database Solutions
>
>
>


-- 
Thanks,
Juned Khan
iNextrix Technologies Pvt Ltd.
www.inextrix.com