Re: [Postgres-xc-general] 答复: Where to connect to communicate pgxc with Application

[Juned K. <jkh...@gm...>]

Hi koichi,zhangzl

Thanks for your suggestions.

So i have to connect my application to directly one of coordinator right.
I thought i have to connect my application to GTM from where my application
will use one of available coordinator.

In this case if i connect my application to connect specific coordinator
using port
then what will happen if that coordinator goes down ?

in the case of GTM when i execute simply Psql -dkoichi then it selects
available
coordinator automatically, this is not possible to setup with application?
if i am able to
connect my application to directly GTM and then it will select any of
available coordinator.

Please suggest.



On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 4:59 AM, 张仲良 <zh...@li...> wrote:

> Use h instead of H；
>
> Maybe you should check your pg_hba.conf file if you still cannot connect
> to it.
>
>
>
> *发件人:* Juned Khan [mailto:jkh...@gm...]
> *发送时间:* 2014年3月14日 20:11
> *收件人:* Postgres-XC mailing list
> *主题:* [Postgres-xc-general] Where to connect to communicate pgxc with
> Application
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have just setup postgre-xc with four servers for testing.
>
> with this four system from GTM server i am able to connect
>
> to database and it selects one of coordinator,. it just works fine.
>
> But now i want to integrate this with my application where application
>
> is on separate server.
>
> so in this case where to connect in pgxc ?
>
> which IP and port i should set in my application to communicate with it?
>
> From some documentation i came to know i should connect to coordinator
>
> but from other system i am not able connect to the database. i am getting
> this
>
>
>
> [postgres@localhost ~]$ psql -H 192.168.1.73 -U postgres -d dbname -p
> 20004
> psql: warning: extra command-line argument "192.168.1.73" ignored
> psql: could not connect to server: No such file or directory
>         Is the server running locally and accepting
>         connections on Unix domain socket "/tmp/.s.PGSQL.20004"?
>
>
>
>
>
> But on this server seems socket port is open
>
> [root@localhost ~]# netstat -pan | grep postgre
> tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:20004               0.0.0.0:*
> LISTEN      9454/postgres
> tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:20008               0.0.0.0:*
> LISTEN      9522/postgres
> tcp        0      0 192.168.1.73:20008          192.168.1.73:33950
> ESTABLISHED 10025/postgres
> tcp        0      0 192.168.1.73:33950          192.168.1.73:20008
> ESTABLISHED 9459/postgres
> tcp        0      0 192.168.1.73:35014          192.168.1.73:20001
> ESTABLISHED 9522/postgres
> tcp        0      0 192.168.1.73:35006          192.168.1.73:20001
> ESTABLISHED 9454/postgres
> tcp        0      0 192.168.1.73:57794          192.168.1.43:20009
> ESTABLISHED 9459/postgres
> tcp        0      0 :::20004
> :::*                        LISTEN      9454/postgres
> tcp        0      0 :::20008
> :::*                        LISTEN      9522/postgres
> udp        0      0 ::1:60142
> ::1:60142                   ESTABLISHED 9522/postgres
> udp        0      0 ::1:59683
> ::1:59683                   ESTABLISHED 9454/postgres
> unix  2      [ ACC ]     STREAM     LISTENING     84606
> 9454/postgres       /tmp/.s.PGSQL.20004
> unix  2      [ ACC ]     STREAM     LISTENING     84641
> 9459/postgres       /tmp/.s.PGPOOL.20010
> unix  2      [ ACC ]     STREAM     LISTENING     85268
> 9522/postgres       /tmp/.s.PGSQL.20008
>
>
>
> am i doing correct ?
>
> Please suggest.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
> Juned Khan
> iNextrix Technologies Pvt Ltd.
> www.inextrix.com
>



-- 
Thanks,
Juned Khan
iNextrix Technologies Pvt Ltd.
www.inextrix.com