|
From: Juned K. <jkh...@gm...> - 2014-03-03 06:20:02
|
Hi Mason, Thanks for your suggestions. So in short as of now postgre-xc is the only solution for me right ? On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Mason Sharp <ms...@tr...>wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Juned Khan <jkh...@gm...> wrote: > >> Hi Mason, >> >> What alternatives i have for my requirements ? >> >> > Hi Juned, > > In the PostgreSQL community, there are a couple of open source > multi-master solutions, Bucardo and RubyRep, but they currently only allow > for two database nodes. I have heard of hacking together a Slony-based > solution to with triggers calling custom functions to roll your own > solution. > > There are other solutions in the greater PostgreSQL ecosystem. The case > you are describing is really the case that the company I work for addresses > with their flagship product, TED, but it is closed source. I believe > EnterpriseDB also offers a proprietary solution. > > Coincidentally, we may provide a special custom version of XC for a > customer with some distributed requirements that are similar to your own. > If this code gets open sourced, I can let you know, but that would be a > ways out in the future. > > > -- > Mason Sharp > > TransLattice - http://www.translattice.com > Distributed and Clustered Database Solutions > > > -- Thanks, Juned Khan iNextrix Technologies Pvt Ltd. www.inextrix.com |