From: 鈴木 幸市 <ko...@in...> - 2014-02-17 07:13:59
|
1.1 is not suffered by this. The bug was introduced during planner code change to deal with PG planner code change (mainly from automatic updatable views). Regards; --- Koichi Suzuki 2014/02/15 3:54、David E. Wheeler <da...@ju...> のメール: > On Feb 13, 2014, at 8:19 PM, 鈴木 幸市 <ko...@in...> wrote: > >> Not really although there will be no feature addition in 1.1. I will keep maintaining 1.1 and 1.0 for a while. As I wrote in the note, 1.2 needs at least one improvement of update/delete in replicated tables. It will be good to begin 1.2 work after GA unless you’d like to practice on it. > > So, does that mean that there might be a 1.1.1 release with bug fixes? Because this feels like a bug to me. > > Thanks, > > David > > > |