From: Ashutosh B. <ash...@en...> - 2014-01-31 03:41:45
|
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:27 PM, David E. Wheeler <da...@ju...>wrote: > On Jan 29, 2014, at 11:14 PM, Ashutosh Bapat < > ash...@en...> wrote: > > > It depends what APIs in Postgres are being used in PostGIS. We have > modified a quite a few internal functions and structures e.g. > standard_ProcessUtility() to work in cluster environment. Using those > functions would break the object linkages. But anything which is SQL > compatible with 10.1 will work against PGXC 2.0 if we get to catch up with > PG by then. One may not need to modify the code in such cases, but would > require to build the extension or binary again. > > Well, that seems a rather long way off, and RPMs can be renamed at that > time, if appropriate. In the meantime, I think using the "xc11" suffix as I > proposed is the way to go. Agreed? > > That looks good. > Best, > > David -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company |