From: David E. W. <da...@ju...> - 2014-01-31 02:08:39
|
On Jan 30, 2014, at 5:34 PM, Koichi Suzuki <koi...@gm...> wrote: > Hmm. There could be two candidates of the cause. > > One is, as you mentioned, set propagation. SET is handled within the > connection pooler in general way so I think this is less probable. > Another is XC-internal alias handling, which took much to fix > especially in the merge with PG master before 9.3 was cut. Would you like me to file a bug report? D |