Re: [Postgres-xc-developers] RPM Packaging XC

[David E. W. <da...@ju...>]

On Jan 29, 2014, at 11:14 PM, Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...> wrote:

> It depends what APIs in Postgres are being used in PostGIS. We have modified a quite a few internal functions and structures e.g. standard_ProcessUtility() to work in cluster environment. Using those functions would break the object linkages. But anything which is SQL compatible with 10.1 will work against PGXC 2.0 if we get to catch up with PG by then. One may not need to modify the code in such cases, but would require to build the extension or binary again.

Well, that seems a rather long way off, and RPMs can be renamed at that time, if appropriate. In the meantime, I think using the "xc11" suffix as I proposed is the way to go. Agreed?

Best,

David