From: Koichi S. <koi...@gm...> - 2014-01-30 01:11:58
|
This is what we're thinking about. XC binary to work in two different modes, standalone and cluster mode. The former should be upward-compatible with PG and the latter provides cluster configuration with scaling. Maybe we can discuss future roadmap and development in the next PGCon face to face. Regards; --- Koichi Suzuki 2014-01-30 David E. Wheeler <da...@ju...>: > On Jan 28, 2014, at 11:00 PM, Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...> wrote: > >> I like this idea. I think, at least for few versions of XC, we will have some differences between PG and XC. But eventually, XC would declare two version numbers XC version and PG version it's based on. In such case, it would be expected that all the PG feature corresponding to that PG version would be in corresponding XC version. Even now XC declares these two things, but not necessarily everything in PG is supported. The list of unsupported features/limitations is declared in the release notes. > > Do you anticipate XC being binary compatible with PG at some point? Will a PostGIS compiled against Postgres 10.1 just work against PGXC 2.0? > > Best, > > David > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > WatchGuard Dimension instantly turns raw network data into actionable > security intelligence. It gives you real-time visual feedback on key > security issues and trends. Skip the complicated setup - simply import > a virtual appliance and go from zero to informed in seconds. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=123612991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Postgres-xc-developers mailing list > Pos...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers |