Re: [Postgres-xc-developers] RPM Packaging XC

[Michael M. <me...@po...>]

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 02:17:13PM -0800, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> > We haven't completely solved the coexistance part yet, but mainly due to time
> > constraints. What we do so far is only build those pieces of XC that are
> > different and rely on the PG packages for the rest.
> 
> Really? You actually have RPMs that depend on Postgres, and add the XC functionality in a binary distribution?

No. First of all we have DEBs no RPMs. And second of all, what I was meaning to say it we have for instance a Postgres-XC server package, because that is different from PostgreSQL. But we do not have an XC libpq package.

> > I think they have to be part of it. After all people might just install XC
> > without PG alongside it.
> 
> But the XC docs include everything from the pg docs, no?

Yes, afaict.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL