Re: [Postgres-xc-developers] RPM Packaging XC

[David E. W. <da...@ju...>]

On Jan 24, 2014, at 12:24 AM, Michael Meskes <me...@po...> wrote:

> We haven't completely solved the coexistance part yet, but mainly due to time
> constraints. What we do so far is only build those pieces of XC that are
> different and rely on the PG packages for the rest.

Really? You actually have RPMs that depend on Postgres, and add the XC functionality in a binary distribution?

> As for the docs, I remember the clean target not removing the generated SGML
> files. However, we do have the specific manpages in place and I do not remember
> them needing any special treatment. But then I may have simply forgotton about
> that one.

I just didn't realize they were in doc-xc instead of doc.

>> I need to maintain corresponding PG docs for work and for merge
>> process, it's convenient to have XC docs in a different directory.
>> Do you think original PG docs should not be a part of XC release?
> 
> I think they have to be part of it. After all people might just install XC
> without PG alongside it.

But the XC docs include everything from the pg docs, no?

Best,

David