Re: [Postgres-xc-bugs] Query are shipped to the data nodes more than needed.

SourceForge Headquarters 225 Broadway Suite 1600 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

Hi Ashutosh,

I am at home and can not connect to the office to debug it today. I will double check the problem on Monday. 

I remember when I debugged it, the proplem is,
Parser will parse "where c1=1 and c2=1 and c3=1" to  "WHERE (((c1 = 1) AND (c2 = 1)) AND (c3 = 1))", which is a list containing two elements:
element 1:  ((c1 = 1) AND (c2 = 1)) which is a BoolExpr;
element 2:  (c3 = 1)
For the element 1, it would not split it into two simple predidates, so the c1 = 1 is missed. 

If I just move the c1 = 1 to the last position, the query can generate the correct plan. 

Thanks
Julian

Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 16:48:47 +0530
Subject: Re: [Postgres-xc-bugs] Query are shipped to the data nodes more than needed.
From: ash...@en...
To: jul...@ou...
CC: pos...@li...

Hi Julian,
I looked at the patch and tried to apply the patch, but there is an error
[ashutosh@ubuntu coderoot]git apply /mnt/hgfs/tmp/20140110_more_datanode_involved.patch 
/mnt/hgfs/tmp/20140110_more_datanode_involved.patch:10: trailing whitespace.

        if (and_clause((Node *) qual_expr))
/mnt/hgfs/tmp/20140110_more_datanode_involved.patch:11: trailing whitespace.
        {
/mnt/hgfs/tmp/20140110_more_datanode_involved.patch:12: trailing whitespace.
            List *sub_lquals = ((BoolExpr *) qual_expr)->args;

/mnt/hgfs/tmp/20140110_more_datanode_involved.patch:13: trailing whitespace.
            distcol_expr = pgxc_find_distcol_expr(varno, attrNum, sub_lquals);
/mnt/hgfs/tmp/20140110_more_datanode_involved.patch:14: trailing whitespace.

            if (distcol_expr != NULL)
fatal: corrupt patch at line 20

Did you use git diff for creating the patch?

BTW, I looked at the patch. The patch seems to be applied to function pgxc_find_distcol_expr() (functions name usually appears along with the diff, if you are using git diff).

In this function there is code 

828     /* Convert the qualification into List if it's not already so */
829     if (!IsA(quals, List))
830         lquals = make_ands_implicit((Expr *)quals);

831     else
832         lquals = (List *)quals;

which takes care of the quals which are not in the List form. This part of the code should have taken care of the case you mentioned. It seems that for some reason, this part is not converting the ANDed quals into List. Can you please check why? May be you want to step through make_ands_implicit() (using gdb or some debugger) to see what's happening there.

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:38 PM, ZhangJulian <jul...@ou...> wrote:

Your 
name                  : Julian ZL Zhang
Your 
email address        : jul...@ou...

System 
Configuration:
---------------------
  Architecture 
(example: Intel Pentium)                : Intel Pentium

  Operating 
System (example: Linux 2.4.18)        : 2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64

  Postgres-XC 
version (example: Postgres-XC 1.1devel): Github master

  Compiler 
used (example: gcc 3.3.5)                : gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-3)

Please 
enter a FULL description of your problem:
------------------------------------------------
I had opened the bug at http://sourceforge.net/p/postgres-xc/bugs/467/ just descripte it more detailedly here. 

Different predicate order results in different plan, the 
query should be shipped only to one datanode, but in the first example, two data 
nodes are involved.

Please 
describe a way to repeat the problem. Please try to provide a
concise 
reproducible example, if at all possible:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

postgres=# create table t1 (c1 int, c2 int, c3 int) 
distribute by hash(c1);
CREATE TABLE
postgres=# explain verbose select * 
from t1 where c1=1 and c2=1 and c3=1;
QUERY PLAN 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data 
Node Scan on "REMOTE_FQS_QUERY" (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0)
Output: 
t1.c1, t1.c2, t1.c3
Node/s: datanode1, datanode2
Remote query: SELECT c1, 
c2, c3 FROM benchmarksql.t1 WHERE (((c1 = 1) AND (c2 = 1)) AND (c3 = 1))
(4 
rows)
postgres=# explain verbose select * from t1 where c2=1 
and c3=1 and c1=1;
QUERY 
PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data 
Node Scan on "REMOTE_FQS_QUERY" (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0)
Output: 
t1.c1, t1.c2, t1.c3
Node/s: datanode1
Remote query: SELECT c1, c2, c3 FROM 
benchmarksql.t1 WHERE (((c2 = 1) AND (c3 = 1)) AND (c1 = 1))
(4 
rows)

If 
you know how this problem might be fixed, list the solution below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I 
made a fix as the append file, which can resolve this issue, but I am not sure if it is correct. 
When I run MAKE CHECK, 3 test cases failed. The results are appended too. 
But when I run MAKE CHECK without the fix, there are also some test cases failed. 

I do not know if the failed test cases are related to the fix. 

Thanks
Julian 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.

Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For

Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.

Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.

http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________

Postgres-xc-bugs mailing list

Pos...@li...

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-bugs

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company