Re: [Postgres-xc-bugs] Building on OS X Mavericks

[Nikhil S. <ni...@st...>]

Nicola,

You are asking it to "make the world". So, it will try to generate the
documentation, for which it will need [open]jade. I don't think you can do
away with it, if you want "install-world".

Regards,
Nikhils


On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:35 PM, DIMI <nic...@un...> wrote:

> On 05/nov/2013, at 14:44, Michael Paquier <mic...@gm...>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Nikhil Sontakke <ni...@st...>
> wrote:
> >> Hi Michael,
> >>
> >> IIRC, setting up docbook, openjade was a little bit of a pain when I
> did it
> >> a while ago. However try the below and see if it helps.
> >>
> >> port install docbook-sgml-4.2 openjade
> > So that's macports, thanks. I'm just using brew, and there is no
> > formula for jade there :)
>
> The ./configure script correctly detects whether jade & co. are installed:
>
> […]
> checking for onsgmls... no
> checking for nsgmls... no
> checking for openjade... no
> checking for jade... no
> checking for DocBook V4.2... no
> checking for DocBook stylesheets... no
> checking for collateindex.pl... /opt/local/bin/collateindex.pl
> checking for xsltproc... xsltproc
> checking for osx... no
> checking for sgml2xml... no
> checking for sx... no
> […]
>
> so I think that 'make install-world' should not attempt to call (open)jade
> when one is not available.
>
> Jade is not in Homebrew, so to upgrade Postgres-XC I would have to change
> the formula to use ‘make install’ instead of ‘make install-world’, which is
> not ideal. Since this problem has occurred in the past (see
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=29327650), and it
> was fixed, I am wondering if the jade dependency can be removed.
>
> Nicola




-- 
StormDB - http://www.stormdb.com
The Database Cloud