From: 鈴木 幸市 <ko...@in...> - 2013-09-30 07:19:21
|
Do you agree not to support event triggers because it does support only a subset of CREATE/ALTER/DROP or XC architecture needs extra improvement? --- Koichi Suzuki On 2013/09/30, at 14:02, Michael Paquier <mic...@gm...> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Abbas Butt > <abb...@en...> wrote: >> The current implementation of event triggers assumes that any statment >> that is not handeled by the main switch-case in standard_ProcessUtility >> supports event triggers. >> CLEAN CONNECTION is a new statement added by XC and does not support >> event triggers as of now. > I would agree not to support event triggers at all for event triggers. > You can have a look at the commands that work with event triggers > here: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/event-trigger-matrix.html > You would notice that only a subset of CREATE/ALTER/DROP commands is > supported only. There is nothing like for example CLUSTER or VACUUM, > etc. > -- > Michael > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Postgres-xc-developers mailing list > Pos...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers > |