Re: [Postgres-xc-developers] Savepoints

[鈴木 幸市 <ko...@in...>]

Right.   Now we should begin discussing what would be the priority for the development beyond 1.2.  In 1.2, we're concentrating on the following:

1. More test for jdbc, through jdbc regression and additional test (mostly subquery and aggregate),
2. Planner improvement for subquery and aggregate in the standard planner (first round, we need a couple of additional rounds for this),
3. Quicker merge with PG9.3.

Unfortunately, savepoint is not in the highest priority.   To me, general support of constraint has higher priority.   This couple of months, we're having many mailing list thread related to this.

I'd like to begin the discussion of our practical roadmap beyond 1.2 soon.

Regards;
---
Koichi Suzuki

On 2013/08/31, at 17:43, Michael Paquier <mic...@gm...>
 wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Leonard Boyce <le...@si...> wrote:
>> Maybe this use-case will bump the feature priority a touch.
> The more the demand, the more it would get on the priority list of
> developers. This is not the first demand for savepoints I am seeing
> since 1.1beta has been released. Suzuki-san?
> -- 
> Michael
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
> Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
> and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
> tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
> Pos...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>