Re: [Postgres-xc-developers] Small leak in GTM

[Nikhil S. <ni...@st...>]

>  Accumulating such fixes are very valuable to the project.
>
>
Yes indeed. Focusing on performance along with emphasis on stability is
indeed important.

And I can see that you have already committed Andrei's memory leak patch.
Sorry about that. For some reason my GIT tree was reporting up-to-date but
did not contain any updates from August! I did a fresh clone from github
and can see all commits properly now.

Regards,
Nikhils


 Regards;
> ---
> Koichi Suzuki
>
>  On 2013/08/22, at 20:31, Nikhil Sontakke <ni...@st...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> PFA, patch which applies against PGXC head, rel11, and rel10.
>
> The node_name which gets added via GTM_RegisterPGXCNode does not get freed
> up.
>
> Btw, Andrei's memleak patch should also be committed soon.
>
> Regards,
> Nikhils
> --
> StormDB - http://www.stormdb.com
> The Database Cloud <small_memleak_gtm.patch>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and
> AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights,
> analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management.
> Visit us today!
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________
> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
> Pos...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>
>
>


-- 
StormDB - http://www.stormdb.com
The Database Cloud