From: Pavan D. <pav...@gm...> - 2013-08-07 09:35:17
|
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Koichi Suzuki <koi...@gm...> wrote: > I still have a couple of questions on the patch. > > 1. Is this way portable enough? It fixes the type of signal handler, > which is originally abstracted. > > FWIW I'd fixed the same issue by using sig_t on darwin. Thanks, Pavan -- Pavan Deolasee http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee |