From: Abbas B. <abb...@en...> - 2013-07-24 07:06:41
|
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Michael Paquier <mic...@gm... > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Ashutosh Bapat < > ash...@en...> wrote: > >> For the sake of everyone's understanding, it would be nice if you can >> describe the general structure of JDBC testcases (if there is write-up >> available point to it) and description of specific problems. E.g. what is >> this build.xml, what does it do? What is the particular problem and so on. >> > +1. Why is this patch for jdbc here? > The patch is not for JDBC, it is for JDBC Regression. Our intention is to run JDBC regression against XC, and we need to change a few things in the test suite to run it like I have mentioned in my previous email in this chain. > Are you guys planning to fork jdbc for XC? > No. > I am still not able to read in people's mind, especially when they are a > couple of thousand kilometers far, so any clarification would be good. > We intend to send small patches so that the review is easy and then combine them all to make a single patch that would be required to be applied to PG JDBC regression suite before it runs against XC with minimal failures. > -- > Michael > -- -- *Abbas* Architect Ph: 92.334.5100153 Skype ID: gabbasb www.enterprisedb.co <http://www.enterprisedb.com/>m<http://www.enterprisedb.com/> * Follow us on Twitter* @EnterpriseDB Visit EnterpriseDB for tutorials, webinars, whitepapers<http://www.enterprisedb.com/resources-community>and more<http://www.enterprisedb.com/resources-community> |