|
From: 鈴木 幸市 <ko...@in...> - 2013-07-22 01:08:35
|
Priority depends upon how it is demanded. Yes, so far, the priority is not high. On the other hand, I expect the development effort is not too much. --- Koichi Suzuki On 2013/07/21, at 22:46, Michael Paquier <mic...@gm...> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Tomasz Straszewski <str...@gm...> wrote: > W dniu 2013-07-21 00:01, Michael Paquier pisze: >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Tomasz Straszewski <str...@gm...> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a question about transactions, i readed that postgres-xc doesn't >> support savepoints. What happens if transaction fails ? >> All the modifications done by this transaction are dropped on all the nodes involved as it rollbacks. >> -- >> Michael > > Hi, > I have one more question. > > Are plans to add functionality of creating save points in future releases ? > It is not explicitly listed in the roadmap maintained by the main developers: > http://postgres-xc.sourceforge.net/ > And as I recall it is not a high priority. > -- > Michael > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics > Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics > Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. > Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________ > Postgres-xc-general mailing list > Pos...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-general |