From: Pavan D. <pav...@gm...> - 2013-04-04 10:23:28
|
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Ashutosh Bapat < ash...@en...> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Ahsan Hadi <ahs...@en...>wrote: > >> Hi Pavan, >> >> Thanks for raising this. Just to make sure i understand the problem, the >> next release of postgres-xc will be 1.1. The 1.1 release will be based on >> PG 9.2, >> > > and that we should merge from master branch of PostgreSQL upto the point > from where REL_9_2 is cut. > If I understand correctly, what we have done right now, is we have pulled > the code from a stable branch (thus pulling changes of 9.2.3, which are not > in master branch and may not part of 9.3 release) > > >> when we create the branch for 1.1 we will continue to do further >> development for the next release and merges in the master branch. >> > > from PostgreSQL master branch and not any REL_ or stable branches. > > >> Any future PG 9.2 point releases will be committed in the 1.1 branch >> going forward. The next major release after 1.1 will be based on PG 9.3. >> >> > Is my annotation right, Pavan? > > Right. And I think we have already made a mistake by merging all of 9.2.3. We should revert that back, but I don't know if there is an easy way to do so :-( Thanks, Pavan -- Pavan Deolasee http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee |