Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Postgres-xc-developers] One patch for showing distribution method, hope it's useful
|
From: Ashutosh B. <ash...@en...> - 2013-03-01 13:11:26
|
Hi Benny,
Sorry for coming back again on this one. I have two requests
1. We are using two different queries to get distribution information, can
we do this in a single query? I am extremely sorry for not spotting this
earlier. Also, can we compress following code
73 + if (tuples > 0)
74 + {
75 + const char *dist_by = _("Distribute By");
76 + const char *loc_nodes = _("Location Nodes");
77 +
78 + /* Only one tuple should be returned */
79 + if (tuples > 1)
80 + goto error_return;
to read
if (tuples == 1)
{
}
else
goto error_return;
2. Can you please provide the documentation changes as well, in the same
patch? You will need to change the sgml file under doc-xc folder
corresponding to app-psql.html. You will find somewhere on Postgres-XC
wiki, how to compile the documentation. Suzuki-san, can you please help
here?
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Ashutosh Bapat <
ash...@en...> wrote:
> I have reviewed the code and it looks fine. The regression is not showing
> any extra diffs.
>
> I will commit this patch tomorrow morning (IST time), if I do not see any
> objections.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Xiong Wang <wan...@gm...>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2013/2/28 Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...>
>>
>>> Hi Benny,
>>>
>>> It seems you commented out some tests in serial schedule in this patch.
>>> Can you please uncomment those?
>>>
>>> Yes. I forgot to clean the comments. Thanks.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> Regards
>>
>> BennyWang
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Xiong Wang <wan...@gm...>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Ashutosh,
>>>>
>>>> I revised the patch according to your advice. I deleted one duplicated
>>>> colon when print "Location Nodes" by your revised patch.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>> Benny Wang
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013/2/28 Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Xiong Wang <wan...@gm...>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Ashutosh,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for your review at first.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I compared inherit.out and inherit_1.out under directory
>>>>>> regress/expected. There's a lot of differences between these two files.
>>>>>> Expected inherit.out keeps the original PG
>>>>>> results. Do you think it's necessary to revise the inherit.out
>>>>>> impacted by this patch?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. As a default we change all the .out files when there is
>>>>> corresponding change in functionality for XC. E.g. now onwards, \d+ output
>>>>> on XC will always have distribution information, so there is no point in
>>>>> keeping the PG output. It's only when the outputs differ because of lack of
>>>>> functionality (restricted features) in XC or because of bugs in XC, we keep
>>>>> the PG output for references and create an alternate expected output file.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Benny Wang
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013/2/27 Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Benny,
>>>>>>> I took a good look at this patch now. Attached please find a revised
>>>>>>> patch, with some minor modifications done. Rest of the comments are below
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. As a general guideline for adding #ifdef SOMETHING, it's good to
>>>>>>> end it with not just #endif but #endif /* SOMETHING */, so that it's easier
>>>>>>> to find the mutually corresponding pairs of #ifdef and #endif. Right now I
>>>>>>> have added it myself in the attached patch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. It's better to print the the distribution information at the end
>>>>>>> of everything else, so that it's easy to spot in case, someone needs to
>>>>>>> differentiate between PG and PGXC output of \d+. This has been taken care
>>>>>>> in the revised patch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3. Distribution type and nodes better be on the same line as their
>>>>>>> heading e.g. Distributed by: REPLICATION. The patch contains the change.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 4. As suggested by Nikhil in one of the mails, the ouptut of
>>>>>>> location nodes needs to be changed from format {node1,node2,..} to node1,
>>>>>>> node2, node3, ... (notice the space after "," and removal of braces.). Done
>>>>>>> in my patch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please provide me a patch, with the regression outputs adjusted
>>>>>>> accordingly. You will need to change inherit.out along-with inherit_1.out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In attached files, print_distribution_info.patch.2 is patch with the
>>>>>>> changes described above applied on your patch.
>>>>>>> print_distribution_info.patch.diff is the patch containing only the changes
>>>>>>> described above. Please review these changes and provide me an updated
>>>>>>> patch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Xiong Wang <wan...@gm...>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I finished the patch. If you have any comments, give me a reply.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Benny Wang
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2013/2/21 Koichi Suzuki <koi...@gm...>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Okay. I hope this satisfies everybody.
>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>> Koichi Suzuki
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2013/2/20 Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...>:
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Xiong Wang <
>>>>>>>>> wan...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >> Hi Ashutosh,
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >> 2013/2/6 Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...>
>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>> Hi Xiong,
>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Xiong Wang <
>>>>>>>>> wan...@gm...>
>>>>>>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>> Hi Ashutosh,
>>>>>>>>> >>>> 2013/2/5 Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Hi Xiong,
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the patch. It's very much awaited feature.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Here are some comments on your patch.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> The patch applies well, but has some unwanted white spaces
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> [ashutosh@ubuntu coderoot]git apply
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> /mnt/hgfs/tmp/print_distribution_info.patch
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> /mnt/hgfs/tmp/print_distribution_info.patch:28: space before
>>>>>>>>> tab in
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> indent.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> "SELECT CASE pclocatortype \n"
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> /mnt/hgfs/tmp/print_distribution_info.patch:35: trailing
>>>>>>>>> whitespace.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> "WHEN '%c' THEN 'MODULO' END || ' ('||
>>>>>>>>> a.attname
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> ||')' as distype\n"
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> /mnt/hgfs/tmp/print_distribution_info.patch:59: trailing
>>>>>>>>> whitespace.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> warning: 3 lines add whitespace errors.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Please take care of those.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>> Thanks for your patient review. I will fix these problems.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> I see that there are comments like /* NOTICE: The number of
>>>>>>>>> beginning
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> whitespace is the same as index print */ followed by
>>>>>>>>> printing of a message
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> with some spaces hard-coded in it. I do not see this style
>>>>>>>>> being used
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> anywhere in the file and it looks problematic. If it happens
>>>>>>>>> that this new
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> information is indented, the hard-coded spaces will not
>>>>>>>>> align properly. Can
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> you please check what's the proper way of aligning the lines
>>>>>>>>> and use that
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> method?
>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>> I add this notice deliberately because the length of white
>>>>>>>>> spaces before
>>>>>>>>> >>>> printing index information is 4. There is no warn similar
>>>>>>>>> with my comment in
>>>>>>>>> >>>> describe.c. So, I will delete this comment within later
>>>>>>>>> patch. Thanks again.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>> Don't just delete the comment, we need to get rid of hardcoded
>>>>>>>>> white
>>>>>>>>> >>> spaces. Do you see any other instance in the file which uses
>>>>>>>>> white spaces?
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >> Yes. There are several other places use hardcoded white spaces
>>>>>>>>> such as
>>>>>>>>> >> printing constraints including check, fk and printing trigger
>>>>>>>>> informations.
>>>>>>>>> >> In order to follow postgresql style, I will just delete my
>>>>>>>>> comments.
>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Instead of following query,
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> 1742 "SELECT node_name FROM
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> pg_catalog.pgxc_node \n"
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> 1743 "WHERE oid::text in \n"
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> 1744 "(SELECT
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> pg_catalog.regexp_split_to_table(nodeoids::text, E'\\\\s+')
>>>>>>>>> FROM
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> pg_catalog.pgxc_class WHERE pcrelid = '%s');"
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> I would use (with proper indentation)
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> SELECT ARRAY(SELECT node_name FROM pg_catalog.pgxc_node
>>>>>>>>> WHERE oid IN
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> (SELECT unnest(nodeoids) FROM pgxc_class WHERE pcrelid =
>>>>>>>>> %s));
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> This query will give you only one row containing all the
>>>>>>>>> nodes. Using
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> unnest to convert an array to table and then using IN
>>>>>>>>> operator is better
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> than converting array to string and using split on string,
>>>>>>>>> and then
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> combining the result back. That way, we don't rely on the
>>>>>>>>> syntax of array to
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> string conversion or any particular regular expression.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>> Great. I didn't find the unnest function. I will change my
>>>>>>>>> query later.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Please provide the fix for the failing regressions as well.
>>>>>>>>> You will
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> need to change the expected output.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>> As for regression failure, I wanted to submit the fixing
>>>>>>>>> patch but my
>>>>>>>>> >>>> test environment is different from yours. I doubt that my
>>>>>>>>> patch for fixing
>>>>>>>>> >>>> the failure may be not useful.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>> Send the expected output changes anyway, we will have to find
>>>>>>>>> out a way
>>>>>>>>> >>> to fix the regression.
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >> Ok.
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > Now you have a way to fix the regression as well. Use ALL
>>>>>>>>> DATANODES if the
>>>>>>>>> > list of nodes contains all the datanodes. We have just seen one
>>>>>>>>> objection.
>>>>>>>>> > Printing ALL DATANODES looks to have uses other than silencing
>>>>>>>>> regressions.
>>>>>>>>> > So, it's worth putting it.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >> Thanks & Regards
>>>>>>>>> >> Benny Wang
>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Rest of the patch looks good.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Xiong Wang <
>>>>>>>>> wan...@gm...>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> The enclosure is the patch for showing distribution
>>>>>>>>> information.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Two sql files, inherit.sql and create_table_like.sql in the
>>>>>>>>> regression
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> test will fail.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Benny Wang
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> 2013/2/1 Koichi Suzuki <koi...@gm...>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, it's nice to have.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I understand there were many discuttions to have it,
>>>>>>>>> separate command
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> or \d and \d+. \d, \d+ extension will not be affected by
>>>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> name conflict. I hope we can handle further change both
>>>>>>>>> in XC and
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> PG. I don't see very big difference in comparison of
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> separate/existing command. Their pros and cons seems to
>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> comparable. So I think we can decide what is more
>>>>>>>>> convenient to
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> use.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> So far, I understand more people prefer \d. It's quite
>>>>>>>>> okay with
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> me.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> In addition, we may want to see each node information
>>>>>>>>> (resource,
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> primary, preferred) and configuration of each nodegroup.
>>>>>>>>> Because
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> is quite new to XC, I think it's better to have
>>>>>>>>> xc-specific command
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> such as \xc something.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards;
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Koichi Suzuki
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2013/2/1 Xiong Wang <wan...@gm...>:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Hi Suzuki,
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> > According to Ashutosh and ANikhil, It seems that they
>>>>>>>>> want to print
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> > distributed method as well as the location node list
>>>>>>>>> using \d+ .
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Are you in favor?
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Benny
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> > 2013/2/1 Koichi Suzuki <koi...@gm...>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> One more issue,
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Does anybody need a command to print node list from
>>>>>>>>> pgxc_node and
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> pgxc_group?
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> ----------
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Koichi Suzuki
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> 2013/2/1 Koichi Suzuki <koi...@gm...>:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > Great!
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > Benny, please post your patch when ready.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > ----------
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > Koichi Suzuki
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > 2013/2/1 Mason Sharp <ma...@st...>:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> <ash...@en...> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> +1. We should add this functionality as \d+.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> +1
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Xion,
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> You will need to output the nodes where the table is
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> distributed or
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> replicated.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Nikhil Sontakke
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> <ni...@st...>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Btw, I vote for showing PGXC output with \d+ and
>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> extended
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> commands
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> only.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Nikhils
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Nikhil Sontakke
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> <ni...@st...>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > I still do not understand how showing additional
>>>>>>>>> stuff in
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > the PGXC
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > version makes it incompatible with vanilla
>>>>>>>>> Postgres?
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > As you can see, the OP made changes to the
>>>>>>>>> *existing* \d
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > logic
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > which
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > is a logical way of doing things. As long as we
>>>>>>>>> use #ifdef
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > PGXC, I
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > do
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > not see how printing additional info breaks
>>>>>>>>> anything.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > Infact it
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > avoids
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > users having to learn more stuff.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > Regards,
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > Nikhils
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Michael Paquier
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > <mic...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Xiong Wang
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> <wan...@gm...>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>> I wrote a simple patch which will show
>>>>>>>>> distribution
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>> information
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>> when
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>> you
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>> use \d tablename command.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> I vote no for that with ¥d. I agree it is
>>>>>>>>> useful, but it
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> makes the
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> output
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> inconsistent with vanilla Postgres. And I am
>>>>>>>>> sure it
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> creates many
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> failures
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> in regression tests. It has been discussed
>>>>>>>>> before to use
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> either a
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> new
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> command with a word or a letter we'll be sure
>>>>>>>>> won't be in
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> conflict
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> with
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> vanilla now and at some point in the future.
>>>>>>>>> Something
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> like
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> "¥distrib"
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> perhaps?
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> --
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> Michael Paquier
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> http://michael.otacoo.com
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> Pos...@li...
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > --
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > StormDB - http://www.stormdb.com
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > The Database Cloud
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > Postgres-XC Support and Service
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> --
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> StormDB - http://www.stormdb.com
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> The Database Cloud
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Postgres-XC Support and Service
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Pos...@li...
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> --
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Best Wishes,
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Ashutosh Bapat
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> EntepriseDB Corporation
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Pos...@li...
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> --
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Mason Sharp
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> StormDB - http://www.stormdb.com
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> The Database Cloud
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Postgres-XC Support and Services
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Pos...@li...
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Pos...@li...
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Pos...@li...
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Best Wishes,
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Ashutosh Bapat
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> EntepriseDB Corporation
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>> --
>>>>>>>>> >>> Best Wishes,
>>>>>>>>> >>> Ashutosh Bapat
>>>>>>>>> >>> EntepriseDB Corporation
>>>>>>>>> >>> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>> > Best Wishes,
>>>>>>>>> > Ashutosh Bapat
>>>>>>>>> > EntepriseDB Corporation
>>>>>>>>> > The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>>>>> > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>>>>> > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>>>>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
>>>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> > Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>>>>> > Pos...@li...
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>>>> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>>>> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>>>> Pos...@li...
>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Best Wishes,
>>>>>>> Ashutosh Bapat
>>>>>>> EntepriseDB Corporation
>>>>>>> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best Wishes,
>>>>> Ashutosh Bapat
>>>>> EntepriseDB Corporation
>>>>> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Wishes,
>>> Ashutosh Bapat
>>> EntepriseDB Corporation
>>> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Wishes,
> Ashutosh Bapat
> EntepriseDB Corporation
> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise Postgres Company
|
