Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Postgres-xc-developers] One patch for showing distribution method, hope it's useful
|
From: Ashutosh B. <ash...@en...> - 2013-02-28 08:44:10
|
I have reviewed the code and it looks fine. The regression is not showing
any extra diffs.
I will commit this patch tomorrow morning (IST time), if I do not see any
objections.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Xiong Wang <wan...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2013/2/28 Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...>
>
>> Hi Benny,
>>
>> It seems you commented out some tests in serial schedule in this patch.
>> Can you please uncomment those?
>>
>> Yes. I forgot to clean the comments. Thanks.
>
>
> Regards
>
> BennyWang
>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Xiong Wang <wan...@gm...>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ashutosh,
>>>
>>> I revised the patch according to your advice. I deleted one duplicated
>>> colon when print "Location Nodes" by your revised patch.
>>>
>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>> Benny Wang
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/2/28 Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Xiong Wang <wan...@gm...>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Ashutosh,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your review at first.
>>>>>
>>>>> I compared inherit.out and inherit_1.out under directory
>>>>> regress/expected. There's a lot of differences between these two files.
>>>>> Expected inherit.out keeps the original PG
>>>>> results. Do you think it's necessary to revise the inherit.out
>>>>> impacted by this patch?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Yes. As a default we change all the .out files when there is
>>>> corresponding change in functionality for XC. E.g. now onwards, \d+ output
>>>> on XC will always have distribution information, so there is no point in
>>>> keeping the PG output. It's only when the outputs differ because of lack of
>>>> functionality (restricted features) in XC or because of bugs in XC, we keep
>>>> the PG output for references and create an alternate expected output file.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Benny Wang
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/2/27 Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Benny,
>>>>>> I took a good look at this patch now. Attached please find a revised
>>>>>> patch, with some minor modifications done. Rest of the comments are below
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. As a general guideline for adding #ifdef SOMETHING, it's good to
>>>>>> end it with not just #endif but #endif /* SOMETHING */, so that it's easier
>>>>>> to find the mutually corresponding pairs of #ifdef and #endif. Right now I
>>>>>> have added it myself in the attached patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. It's better to print the the distribution information at the end
>>>>>> of everything else, so that it's easy to spot in case, someone needs to
>>>>>> differentiate between PG and PGXC output of \d+. This has been taken care
>>>>>> in the revised patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3. Distribution type and nodes better be on the same line as their
>>>>>> heading e.g. Distributed by: REPLICATION. The patch contains the change.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 4. As suggested by Nikhil in one of the mails, the ouptut of location
>>>>>> nodes needs to be changed from format {node1,node2,..} to node1, node2,
>>>>>> node3, ... (notice the space after "," and removal of braces.). Done in my
>>>>>> patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please provide me a patch, with the regression outputs adjusted
>>>>>> accordingly. You will need to change inherit.out along-with inherit_1.out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In attached files, print_distribution_info.patch.2 is patch with the
>>>>>> changes described above applied on your patch.
>>>>>> print_distribution_info.patch.diff is the patch containing only the changes
>>>>>> described above. Please review these changes and provide me an updated
>>>>>> patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Xiong Wang <wan...@gm...>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I finished the patch. If you have any comments, give me a reply.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Benny Wang
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2013/2/21 Koichi Suzuki <koi...@gm...>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Okay. I hope this satisfies everybody.
>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>> Koichi Suzuki
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2013/2/20 Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...>:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Xiong Wang <
>>>>>>>> wan...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Hi Ashutosh,
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> 2013/2/6 Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...>
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Hi Xiong,
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Xiong Wang <
>>>>>>>> wan...@gm...>
>>>>>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> Hi Ashutosh,
>>>>>>>> >>>> 2013/2/5 Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>> Hi Xiong,
>>>>>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the patch. It's very much awaited feature.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>> Here are some comments on your patch.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>> The patch applies well, but has some unwanted white spaces
>>>>>>>> >>>>> [ashutosh@ubuntu coderoot]git apply
>>>>>>>> >>>>> /mnt/hgfs/tmp/print_distribution_info.patch
>>>>>>>> >>>>> /mnt/hgfs/tmp/print_distribution_info.patch:28: space before
>>>>>>>> tab in
>>>>>>>> >>>>> indent.
>>>>>>>> >>>>> "SELECT CASE pclocatortype \n"
>>>>>>>> >>>>> /mnt/hgfs/tmp/print_distribution_info.patch:35: trailing
>>>>>>>> whitespace.
>>>>>>>> >>>>> "WHEN '%c' THEN 'MODULO' END || ' ('||
>>>>>>>> a.attname
>>>>>>>> >>>>> ||')' as distype\n"
>>>>>>>> >>>>> /mnt/hgfs/tmp/print_distribution_info.patch:59: trailing
>>>>>>>> whitespace.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>> warning: 3 lines add whitespace errors.
>>>>>>>> >>>>> Please take care of those.
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> Thanks for your patient review. I will fix these problems.
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>> I see that there are comments like /* NOTICE: The number of
>>>>>>>> beginning
>>>>>>>> >>>>> whitespace is the same as index print */ followed by printing
>>>>>>>> of a message
>>>>>>>> >>>>> with some spaces hard-coded in it. I do not see this style
>>>>>>>> being used
>>>>>>>> >>>>> anywhere in the file and it looks problematic. If it happens
>>>>>>>> that this new
>>>>>>>> >>>>> information is indented, the hard-coded spaces will not align
>>>>>>>> properly. Can
>>>>>>>> >>>>> you please check what's the proper way of aligning the lines
>>>>>>>> and use that
>>>>>>>> >>>>> method?
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> I add this notice deliberately because the length of white
>>>>>>>> spaces before
>>>>>>>> >>>> printing index information is 4. There is no warn similar with
>>>>>>>> my comment in
>>>>>>>> >>>> describe.c. So, I will delete this comment within later patch.
>>>>>>>> Thanks again.
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Don't just delete the comment, we need to get rid of hardcoded
>>>>>>>> white
>>>>>>>> >>> spaces. Do you see any other instance in the file which uses
>>>>>>>> white spaces?
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Yes. There are several other places use hardcoded white spaces
>>>>>>>> such as
>>>>>>>> >> printing constraints including check, fk and printing trigger
>>>>>>>> informations.
>>>>>>>> >> In order to follow postgresql style, I will just delete my
>>>>>>>> comments.
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>> Instead of following query,
>>>>>>>> >>>>> 1742 "SELECT node_name FROM
>>>>>>>> >>>>> pg_catalog.pgxc_node \n"
>>>>>>>> >>>>> 1743 "WHERE oid::text in \n"
>>>>>>>> >>>>> 1744 "(SELECT
>>>>>>>> >>>>> pg_catalog.regexp_split_to_table(nodeoids::text, E'\\\\s+')
>>>>>>>> FROM
>>>>>>>> >>>>> pg_catalog.pgxc_class WHERE pcrelid = '%s');"
>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>> I would use (with proper indentation)
>>>>>>>> >>>>> SELECT ARRAY(SELECT node_name FROM pg_catalog.pgxc_node WHERE
>>>>>>>> oid IN
>>>>>>>> >>>>> (SELECT unnest(nodeoids) FROM pgxc_class WHERE pcrelid = %s));
>>>>>>>> >>>>> This query will give you only one row containing all the
>>>>>>>> nodes. Using
>>>>>>>> >>>>> unnest to convert an array to table and then using IN
>>>>>>>> operator is better
>>>>>>>> >>>>> than converting array to string and using split on string,
>>>>>>>> and then
>>>>>>>> >>>>> combining the result back. That way, we don't rely on the
>>>>>>>> syntax of array to
>>>>>>>> >>>>> string conversion or any particular regular expression.
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> Great. I didn't find the unnest function. I will change my
>>>>>>>> query later.
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>> Please provide the fix for the failing regressions as well.
>>>>>>>> You will
>>>>>>>> >>>>> need to change the expected output.
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> As for regression failure, I wanted to submit the fixing patch
>>>>>>>> but my
>>>>>>>> >>>> test environment is different from yours. I doubt that my
>>>>>>>> patch for fixing
>>>>>>>> >>>> the failure may be not useful.
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Send the expected output changes anyway, we will have to find
>>>>>>>> out a way
>>>>>>>> >>> to fix the regression.
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Ok.
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Now you have a way to fix the regression as well. Use ALL
>>>>>>>> DATANODES if the
>>>>>>>> > list of nodes contains all the datanodes. We have just seen one
>>>>>>>> objection.
>>>>>>>> > Printing ALL DATANODES looks to have uses other than silencing
>>>>>>>> regressions.
>>>>>>>> > So, it's worth putting it.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Thanks & Regards
>>>>>>>> >> Benny Wang
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>> Rest of the patch looks good.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Xiong Wang <
>>>>>>>> wan...@gm...>
>>>>>>>> >>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>> The enclosure is the patch for showing distribution
>>>>>>>> information.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Two sql files, inherit.sql and create_table_like.sql in the
>>>>>>>> regression
>>>>>>>> >>>>>> test will fail.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Benny Wang
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>> 2013/2/1 Koichi Suzuki <koi...@gm...>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, it's nice to have.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I understand there were many discuttions to have it,
>>>>>>>> separate command
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> or \d and \d+. \d, \d+ extension will not be affected by
>>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> name conflict. I hope we can handle further change both
>>>>>>>> in XC and
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> PG. I don't see very big difference in comparison of
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> separate/existing command. Their pros and cons seems to be
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> comparable. So I think we can decide what is more
>>>>>>>> convenient to
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> use.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> So far, I understand more people prefer \d. It's quite
>>>>>>>> okay with
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> me.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> In addition, we may want to see each node information
>>>>>>>> (resource,
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> primary, preferred) and configuration of each nodegroup.
>>>>>>>> Because
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> is quite new to XC, I think it's better to have xc-specific
>>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> such as \xc something.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards;
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Koichi Suzuki
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2013/2/1 Xiong Wang <wan...@gm...>:
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Hi Suzuki,
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> > According to Ashutosh and ANikhil, It seems that they
>>>>>>>> want to print
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> > distributed method as well as the location node list
>>>>>>>> using \d+ .
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Are you in favor?
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Benny
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> > 2013/2/1 Koichi Suzuki <koi...@gm...>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> One more issue,
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Does anybody need a command to print node list from
>>>>>>>> pgxc_node and
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> pgxc_group?
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> ----------
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Koichi Suzuki
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> 2013/2/1 Koichi Suzuki <koi...@gm...>:
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > Great!
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > Benny, please post your patch when ready.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > ----------
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > Koichi Suzuki
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > 2013/2/1 Mason Sharp <ma...@st...>:
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> <ash...@en...> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> +1. We should add this functionality as \d+.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> +1
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Xion,
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> You will need to output the nodes where the table is
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> distributed or
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> replicated.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Nikhil Sontakke
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> <ni...@st...>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Btw, I vote for showing PGXC output with \d+ and
>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> extended
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> commands
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> only.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Nikhils
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Nikhil Sontakke
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> <ni...@st...>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > I still do not understand how showing additional
>>>>>>>> stuff in
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > the PGXC
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > version makes it incompatible with vanilla
>>>>>>>> Postgres?
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > As you can see, the OP made changes to the
>>>>>>>> *existing* \d
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > logic
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > which
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > is a logical way of doing things. As long as we
>>>>>>>> use #ifdef
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > PGXC, I
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > do
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > not see how printing additional info breaks
>>>>>>>> anything.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > Infact it
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > avoids
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > users having to learn more stuff.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > Regards,
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > Nikhils
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Michael Paquier
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > <mic...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Xiong Wang
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> <wan...@gm...>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>> I wrote a simple patch which will show
>>>>>>>> distribution
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>> information
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>> when
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>> you
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>> use \d tablename command.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> I vote no for that with ¥d. I agree it is
>>>>>>>> useful, but it
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> makes the
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> output
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> inconsistent with vanilla Postgres. And I am
>>>>>>>> sure it
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> creates many
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> failures
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> in regression tests. It has been discussed
>>>>>>>> before to use
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> either a
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> new
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> command with a word or a letter we'll be sure
>>>>>>>> won't be in
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> conflict
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> with
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> vanilla now and at some point in the future.
>>>>>>>> Something
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> like
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> "¥distrib"
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> perhaps?
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> --
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> Michael Paquier
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> http://michael.otacoo.com
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> Pos...@li...
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > --
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > StormDB - http://www.stormdb.com
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > The Database Cloud
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > Postgres-XC Support and Service
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> --
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> StormDB - http://www.stormdb.com
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> The Database Cloud
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Postgres-XC Support and Service
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Pos...@li...
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> --
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Best Wishes,
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Ashutosh Bapat
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> EntepriseDB Corporation
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Pos...@li...
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> --
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Mason Sharp
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> StormDB - http://www.stormdb.com
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> The Database Cloud
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Postgres-XC Support and Services
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Pos...@li...
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Pos...@li...
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
>>>>>>>> >>>>>> and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
>>>>>>>> >>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
>>>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Pos...@li...
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>> --
>>>>>>>> >>>>> Best Wishes,
>>>>>>>> >>>>> Ashutosh Bapat
>>>>>>>> >>>>> EntepriseDB Corporation
>>>>>>>> >>>>> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> --
>>>>>>>> >>> Best Wishes,
>>>>>>>> >>> Ashutosh Bapat
>>>>>>>> >>> EntepriseDB Corporation
>>>>>>>> >>> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>> > Best Wishes,
>>>>>>>> > Ashutosh Bapat
>>>>>>>> > EntepriseDB Corporation
>>>>>>>> > The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>>>> > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>>>> > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>>>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
>>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> > Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>>>> > Pos...@li...
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>>> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>>> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>>> Pos...@li...
>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best Wishes,
>>>>>> Ashutosh Bapat
>>>>>> EntepriseDB Corporation
>>>>>> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Wishes,
>>>> Ashutosh Bapat
>>>> EntepriseDB Corporation
>>>> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Wishes,
>> Ashutosh Bapat
>> EntepriseDB Corporation
>> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>
>
>
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise Postgres Company
|
