Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Postgres-xc-developers] One patch for showing distribution method, hope it's useful
|
From: Ashutosh B. <ash...@en...> - 2013-02-28 06:43:20
|
Hi Benny,
It seems you commented out some tests in serial schedule in this patch. Can
you please uncomment those?
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Xiong Wang <wan...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi Ashutosh,
>
> I revised the patch according to your advice. I deleted one duplicated
> colon when print "Location Nodes" by your revised patch.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Benny Wang
>
>
> 2013/2/28 Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...>
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Xiong Wang <wan...@gm...>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ashutosh,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your review at first.
>>>
>>> I compared inherit.out and inherit_1.out under directory
>>> regress/expected. There's a lot of differences between these two files.
>>> Expected inherit.out keeps the original PG
>>> results. Do you think it's necessary to revise the inherit.out impacted
>>> by this patch?
>>>
>>>
>> Yes. As a default we change all the .out files when there is
>> corresponding change in functionality for XC. E.g. now onwards, \d+ output
>> on XC will always have distribution information, so there is no point in
>> keeping the PG output. It's only when the outputs differ because of lack of
>> functionality (restricted features) in XC or because of bugs in XC, we keep
>> the PG output for references and create an alternate expected output file.
>>
>>
>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>
>>> Benny Wang
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/2/27 Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...>
>>>
>>>> Hi Benny,
>>>> I took a good look at this patch now. Attached please find a revised
>>>> patch, with some minor modifications done. Rest of the comments are below
>>>>
>>>> 1. As a general guideline for adding #ifdef SOMETHING, it's good to end
>>>> it with not just #endif but #endif /* SOMETHING */, so that it's easier to
>>>> find the mutually corresponding pairs of #ifdef and #endif. Right now I
>>>> have added it myself in the attached patch.
>>>>
>>>> 2. It's better to print the the distribution information at the end of
>>>> everything else, so that it's easy to spot in case, someone needs to
>>>> differentiate between PG and PGXC output of \d+. This has been taken care
>>>> in the revised patch.
>>>>
>>>> 3. Distribution type and nodes better be on the same line as their
>>>> heading e.g. Distributed by: REPLICATION. The patch contains the change.
>>>>
>>>> 4. As suggested by Nikhil in one of the mails, the ouptut of location
>>>> nodes needs to be changed from format {node1,node2,..} to node1, node2,
>>>> node3, ... (notice the space after "," and removal of braces.). Done in my
>>>> patch.
>>>>
>>>> Please provide me a patch, with the regression outputs adjusted
>>>> accordingly. You will need to change inherit.out along-with inherit_1.out.
>>>>
>>>> In attached files, print_distribution_info.patch.2 is patch with the
>>>> changes described above applied on your patch.
>>>> print_distribution_info.patch.diff is the patch containing only the changes
>>>> described above. Please review these changes and provide me an updated
>>>> patch.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Xiong Wang <wan...@gm...>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I finished the patch. If you have any comments, give me a reply.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Benny Wang
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/2/21 Koichi Suzuki <koi...@gm...>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Okay. I hope this satisfies everybody.
>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>> Koichi Suzuki
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013/2/20 Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...>:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Xiong Wang <
>>>>>> wan...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Hi Ashutosh,
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> 2013/2/6 Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> Hi Xiong,
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Xiong Wang <
>>>>>> wan...@gm...>
>>>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> Hi Ashutosh,
>>>>>> >>>> 2013/2/5 Ashutosh Bapat <ash...@en...>
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> Hi Xiong,
>>>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the patch. It's very much awaited feature.
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> Here are some comments on your patch.
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> The patch applies well, but has some unwanted white spaces
>>>>>> >>>>> [ashutosh@ubuntu coderoot]git apply
>>>>>> >>>>> /mnt/hgfs/tmp/print_distribution_info.patch
>>>>>> >>>>> /mnt/hgfs/tmp/print_distribution_info.patch:28: space before
>>>>>> tab in
>>>>>> >>>>> indent.
>>>>>> >>>>> "SELECT CASE pclocatortype \n"
>>>>>> >>>>> /mnt/hgfs/tmp/print_distribution_info.patch:35: trailing
>>>>>> whitespace.
>>>>>> >>>>> "WHEN '%c' THEN 'MODULO' END || ' ('||
>>>>>> a.attname
>>>>>> >>>>> ||')' as distype\n"
>>>>>> >>>>> /mnt/hgfs/tmp/print_distribution_info.patch:59: trailing
>>>>>> whitespace.
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> warning: 3 lines add whitespace errors.
>>>>>> >>>>> Please take care of those.
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> Thanks for your patient review. I will fix these problems.
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> I see that there are comments like /* NOTICE: The number of
>>>>>> beginning
>>>>>> >>>>> whitespace is the same as index print */ followed by printing
>>>>>> of a message
>>>>>> >>>>> with some spaces hard-coded in it. I do not see this style
>>>>>> being used
>>>>>> >>>>> anywhere in the file and it looks problematic. If it happens
>>>>>> that this new
>>>>>> >>>>> information is indented, the hard-coded spaces will not align
>>>>>> properly. Can
>>>>>> >>>>> you please check what's the proper way of aligning the lines
>>>>>> and use that
>>>>>> >>>>> method?
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> I add this notice deliberately because the length of white
>>>>>> spaces before
>>>>>> >>>> printing index information is 4. There is no warn similar with
>>>>>> my comment in
>>>>>> >>>> describe.c. So, I will delete this comment within later patch.
>>>>>> Thanks again.
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> Don't just delete the comment, we need to get rid of hardcoded
>>>>>> white
>>>>>> >>> spaces. Do you see any other instance in the file which uses
>>>>>> white spaces?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Yes. There are several other places use hardcoded white spaces
>>>>>> such as
>>>>>> >> printing constraints including check, fk and printing trigger
>>>>>> informations.
>>>>>> >> In order to follow postgresql style, I will just delete my
>>>>>> comments.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> Instead of following query,
>>>>>> >>>>> 1742 "SELECT node_name FROM
>>>>>> >>>>> pg_catalog.pgxc_node \n"
>>>>>> >>>>> 1743 "WHERE oid::text in \n"
>>>>>> >>>>> 1744 "(SELECT
>>>>>> >>>>> pg_catalog.regexp_split_to_table(nodeoids::text, E'\\\\s+') FROM
>>>>>> >>>>> pg_catalog.pgxc_class WHERE pcrelid = '%s');"
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> I would use (with proper indentation)
>>>>>> >>>>> SELECT ARRAY(SELECT node_name FROM pg_catalog.pgxc_node WHERE
>>>>>> oid IN
>>>>>> >>>>> (SELECT unnest(nodeoids) FROM pgxc_class WHERE pcrelid = %s));
>>>>>> >>>>> This query will give you only one row containing all the nodes.
>>>>>> Using
>>>>>> >>>>> unnest to convert an array to table and then using IN operator
>>>>>> is better
>>>>>> >>>>> than converting array to string and using split on string, and
>>>>>> then
>>>>>> >>>>> combining the result back. That way, we don't rely on the
>>>>>> syntax of array to
>>>>>> >>>>> string conversion or any particular regular expression.
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> Great. I didn't find the unnest function. I will change my query
>>>>>> later.
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> Please provide the fix for the failing regressions as well. You
>>>>>> will
>>>>>> >>>>> need to change the expected output.
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> As for regression failure, I wanted to submit the fixing patch
>>>>>> but my
>>>>>> >>>> test environment is different from yours. I doubt that my patch
>>>>>> for fixing
>>>>>> >>>> the failure may be not useful.
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> Send the expected output changes anyway, we will have to find out
>>>>>> a way
>>>>>> >>> to fix the regression.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Ok.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Now you have a way to fix the regression as well. Use ALL DATANODES
>>>>>> if the
>>>>>> > list of nodes contains all the datanodes. We have just seen one
>>>>>> objection.
>>>>>> > Printing ALL DATANODES looks to have uses other than silencing
>>>>>> regressions.
>>>>>> > So, it's worth putting it.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Thanks & Regards
>>>>>> >> Benny Wang
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> Rest of the patch looks good.
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Xiong Wang <
>>>>>> wan...@gm...>
>>>>>> >>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>> The enclosure is the patch for showing distribution
>>>>>> information.
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>> Two sql files, inherit.sql and create_table_like.sql in the
>>>>>> regression
>>>>>> >>>>>> test will fail.
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>> Benny Wang
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>> 2013/2/1 Koichi Suzuki <koi...@gm...>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, it's nice to have.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> I understand there were many discuttions to have it, separate
>>>>>> command
>>>>>> >>>>>>> or \d and \d+. \d, \d+ extension will not be affected by
>>>>>> command
>>>>>> >>>>>>> name conflict. I hope we can handle further change both in
>>>>>> XC and
>>>>>> >>>>>>> PG. I don't see very big difference in comparison of
>>>>>> >>>>>>> separate/existing command. Their pros and cons seems to be
>>>>>> >>>>>>> comparable. So I think we can decide what is more
>>>>>> convenient to
>>>>>> >>>>>>> use.
>>>>>> >>>>>>> So far, I understand more people prefer \d. It's quite
>>>>>> okay with
>>>>>> >>>>>>> me.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> In addition, we may want to see each node information
>>>>>> (resource,
>>>>>> >>>>>>> primary, preferred) and configuration of each nodegroup.
>>>>>> Because
>>>>>> >>>>>>> this
>>>>>> >>>>>>> is quite new to XC, I think it's better to have xc-specific
>>>>>> command
>>>>>> >>>>>>> such as \xc something.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards;
>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>> >>>>>>> Koichi Suzuki
>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2013/2/1 Xiong Wang <wan...@gm...>:
>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Hi Suzuki,
>>>>>> >>>>>>> > According to Ashutosh and ANikhil, It seems that they want
>>>>>> to print
>>>>>> >>>>>>> > distributed method as well as the location node list using
>>>>>> \d+ .
>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Are you in favor?
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Benny
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>> > 2013/2/1 Koichi Suzuki <koi...@gm...>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> One more issue,
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Does anybody need a command to print node list from
>>>>>> pgxc_node and
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> pgxc_group?
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> ----------
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Koichi Suzuki
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> 2013/2/1 Koichi Suzuki <koi...@gm...>:
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > Great!
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > Benny, please post your patch when ready.
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > ----------
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > Koichi Suzuki
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > 2013/2/1 Mason Sharp <ma...@st...>:
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> <ash...@en...> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> +1. We should add this functionality as \d+.
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> +1
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Xion,
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> You will need to output the nodes where the table is
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> distributed or
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> replicated.
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Nikhil Sontakke
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> <ni...@st...>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Btw, I vote for showing PGXC output with \d+ and other
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> extended
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> commands
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> only.
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Nikhils
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Nikhil Sontakke
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> <ni...@st...>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > I still do not understand how showing additional
>>>>>> stuff in
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > the PGXC
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > version makes it incompatible with vanilla Postgres?
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > As you can see, the OP made changes to the
>>>>>> *existing* \d
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > logic
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > which
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > is a logical way of doing things. As long as we use
>>>>>> #ifdef
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > PGXC, I
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > do
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > not see how printing additional info breaks
>>>>>> anything.
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > Infact it
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > avoids
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > users having to learn more stuff.
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > Regards,
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > Nikhils
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Michael Paquier
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > <mic...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Xiong Wang
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> <wan...@gm...>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>> I wrote a simple patch which will show
>>>>>> distribution
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>> information
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>> when
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>> you
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>> use \d tablename command.
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> I vote no for that with ¥d. I agree it is useful,
>>>>>> but it
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> makes the
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> output
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> inconsistent with vanilla Postgres. And I am sure
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> creates many
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> failures
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> in regression tests. It has been discussed before
>>>>>> to use
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> either a
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> new
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> command with a word or a letter we'll be sure
>>>>>> won't be in
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> conflict
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> with
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> vanilla now and at some point in the future.
>>>>>> Something
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> like
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> "¥distrib"
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> perhaps?
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> --
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> Michael Paquier
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> http://michael.otacoo.com
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> Pos...@li...
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > --
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > StormDB - http://www.stormdb.com
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > The Database Cloud
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> > Postgres-XC Support and Service
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> --
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> StormDB - http://www.stormdb.com
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> The Database Cloud
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Postgres-XC Support and Service
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> Pos...@li...
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> --
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Best Wishes,
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Ashutosh Bapat
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> EntepriseDB Corporation
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Pos...@li...
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> --
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Mason Sharp
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> StormDB - http://www.stormdb.com
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> The Database Cloud
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Postgres-XC Support and Services
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> Pos...@li...
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Pos...@li...
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >>>>>> Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
>>>>>> >>>>>> Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
>>>>>> >>>>>> and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
>>>>>> >>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >>>>>> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>> >>>>>> Pos...@li...
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> --
>>>>>> >>>>> Best Wishes,
>>>>>> >>>>> Ashutosh Bapat
>>>>>> >>>>> EntepriseDB Corporation
>>>>>> >>>>> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> --
>>>>>> >>> Best Wishes,
>>>>>> >>> Ashutosh Bapat
>>>>>> >>> EntepriseDB Corporation
>>>>>> >>> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > --
>>>>>> > Best Wishes,
>>>>>> > Ashutosh Bapat
>>>>>> > EntepriseDB Corporation
>>>>>> > The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>>> > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>>> > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>> > Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>>> > Pos...@li...
>>>>>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>>> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>>> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>>> Pos...@li...
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Wishes,
>>>> Ashutosh Bapat
>>>> EntepriseDB Corporation
>>>> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Wishes,
>> Ashutosh Bapat
>> EntepriseDB Corporation
>> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>
>
>
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise Postgres Company
|
