From: Koichi S. <koi...@gm...> - 2013-02-22 03:13:00
|
Changing the macro into a function does not solve the issue. It does not eliminate the need to acquire the lock. Adding comment to the macro definition is reasonable compromise. Regards; ---------- Koichi Suzuki 2013/2/22 Michael Paquier <mic...@gm...>: > Thanks. Applied. > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Nikhil Sontakke <ni...@st...> > wrote: >> >> Or we can even remove this macro to be on the safe side. > > Not sure, it looks pretty useful to do that as a macro for transaction count > control. > -- > Michael > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb > _______________________________________________ > Postgres-xc-developers mailing list > Pos...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers > |