Re: [Postgres-xc-general] Our general use case

[Vladimir S. <vst...@gm...>]

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Roger Mayes <rog...@gm...> wrote:

> Odd that their list publishes our email addresses, and if I hit "reply" (in
> gmail), it goes to the person who made the post rather than to the list.

Click arrow on the right of "Reply" button, then click "Reply all". Or
copy/past list address into CC: field.

> gmail is more-or-less commercial software, isn't it?  Lol.

No matter commercial or not. More important is open source criteria.

> It seems like our conversation has gone a bit afield of the list's topic,
> anyway.

We continue discussion about HA for XC.

> So have you found any way to do get write scalability and high availability?

I've already wrote here about this. I think at this time the best
solution is alliance of drbd + pacemaker + corosync. It is  very
effective, reliable and rather simple setup for duplicating every
node. I have such architecture running lot of vz boxes. But it is no
matter what services are there running. The difference is only
resource agent, i.e. start/stop script. BTW among others (most of them
are web, application and database servers) there are postgresql
running inside those vz boxes without any problems.