|
From: Vladimir S. <vst...@gm...> - 2012-10-24 20:49:28
|
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:00:51PM -0400, Jim Mlodgenski wrote: > The default will to distribute by HASH if it has some sort of valid My congratulations! I was thought so too ... before have tested it. But my surprise was when I've found the same data on every node. More over, despite of redundancy, XC stop working if one node fails. But it's no matter, because more important thing is that in any case for every table You should choose either read or write scalability, rewriting "CREATE TABLE" accordantly, while mysql cluster provides both at the same time for all tables without any headache about distribution schemas. i.e. all data are replicated and distributed at the same time. The only essential difference, that prevent consider mysql cluster as alternative for XC is that as I mentioned earlier, it is in-memory data base and as so it is limited in size, while XC have no such limit. Though be aware it's all about 1.0.0. I don't test all of these features against 1.0.1 yet. *************************** ### Vladimir Stavrinov ### vst...@gm... *************************** |