|
From: Vladimir S. <vst...@gm...> - 2012-07-31 10:33:23
|
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:21:06PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > is real case)? And as I see, to do opposite operation, i.e. adding > data node, wee need to use this CREATE/DROP/RENAME TABLE technique again? > It doesn't look like HA. > > In 1.0, yes. And this is only necessary for hash/modulo/round robin tables. No, it is necessary for replicated tables too. More over, in summary it is necessary in any case of nodes adding or removal with any type of tables, replicated or distributed. This is experimental fact. The reason is that You cannot use ALTER TABLE statement to change the nodes list. The result is that if single node fail, cluster of any configuration stop working. In case of replicated node You still can do SELECT but not INSERT or UPDATE. And You can't simply remove failed node in this case too. Eventually any changes in nodes number lead to recreating overall cluster from scratch: You should drop databases and restore it from backup. It is realty now. Sorry. -- *************************** ## Vladimir Stavrinov ## vst...@gm... *************************** |