Re: [Postgres-xc-general] License of Postgres-XC related documents and contents

[Michael P. <mic...@gm...>]

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd...@co...>wrote:

>
> On 07/23/2012 03:34 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
>      Agreed, which is why I suggested keeping our hands clean but forcing
>> the
>>     good community-citizen approach with attribution.
>>
>> On this point I kind of agree, everything that is labelled as
>> "Postgres-XC development group" should be based on the same license as
>> the code to facilitate all the things.
>> However, docs written by guys not using Postgres-XC development group
>> name on their docs but a personal name or company name can provide the
>> license they want and if other people want to pick up those documents
>> they need to contact the authors. This is for example the case of my own
>> presentation documents. Those docs are under non-commercial as I use on
>> them my company name and my own name.
>>
>
> There is no way to force any author to release any document under any
> license except in the instance where the author would like to contribute
> that documentation directly to the Postgres-XC development group. In that
> case (say a patch submission, or acceptance on the website or wiki) we can
> force a specific license. Otherwise, we are powerless.

So we agree here.


>  So Michael, I believe with that your concerns are addressed, yes?

Yes.
-- 
Michael Paquier
http://michael.otacoo.com