Re: [Postgres-xc-general] License of Postgres-XC related documents and contents

[Koichi S. <koi...@gm...>]

Sorry, it was a wrong refer.   Joshua suggested some of the
fundraising and copyright.   Anyway, I think it's better to start with
non-commercial and see what corner cases we should be careful about.

Regards;
----------
Koichi Suzuki


2012/7/22 Mason Sharp <ma...@st...>:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Koichi Suzuki
> <koi...@gm...> wrote:
>> As Mason suggested, I think it's safer to begin with non-commercial
>> license.   Commercial use can be licensed in case-by-case basis and we
>> should license as long as the use helps XC.   There could be many
>> different commercial use and I'm not sure if the commercial license
>> helps XC in many corner cases.
>>
>
> Actually, I just meant that I think anything created by the
> "Postgres-XC Development Group" as a whole should allow liberal usage
> (whatever license that would be), including commercial use, and that
> if someone creates something and wants some restrictions, they should
> do it under their own name or company. Isn't that similar to the
> PostgreSQL community?  If the others in the XC community wants to go a
> different route, that's fine, I just hope it does not become overly
> bureaucratic.
>
> --
> Mason Sharp
>
> StormDB - http://www.stormdb.com
> The Database Cloud