|
From: Joshua D. D. <jd...@co...> - 2012-07-20 14:57:57
|
On 07/19/2012 10:10 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > Thanks for spending time on that. The structure looks nice and > sufficient for its purpose. > > I am just wondering about a couple of things... > 1) in the documentation part, why only having a link refering to the > docs in SourceForge? Wouldn't it make more sense to generate the docs > automatically at each minor or major release? Yes I just don't have that setup. > It would also be extremely > nice for all the developers and users to have an automatic build of > latest development docs on master branch. Referring only to the > sourceforge site is not really a big matter in itself but makes your > sire structure dependent on what is in sourceforge. Yeah I don't see that as a problem. > 2) SourceForge is stopping support of MediaWiki at the beginning of > September, you should remove the link to it. Are we going to grab the content? > 3) I also maintain a repository in Github: > https://github.com/postgres-xc/postgres-xc. This is just a mirror but it > is far more readable than the ugly sourceforge interface. It might be > worth referring to it. I would think that the GitHub should be the master branch :) jD > > > -- > Michael Paquier > http://michael.otacoo.com -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC @cmdpromptinc - 509-416-6579 |