Re: [Postgres-xc-general] License of Postgres-XC related documents and contents

[Michael P. <mic...@gm...>]

On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Michael Paquier
<mic...@gm...>wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Mason Sharp <ma...@st...> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Koichi Suzuki <ko...@in...>
>> wrote:
>> > Mason is proposing that it's better to license XC contents commercially
>> as well.
>> >
>>
>> I am just saying that anything from the Postgres-XC Development Group
>> could be like the PostgreSQL Development Group and allow liberal
>> usage. If someone does not want to allow liberal usage, then they put
>> it under their own name or company name instead of the Postgres-XC
>> Development Group, and under any such license that they choose (is
>> that more similar to how PostgreSQL also operates?).  It seems like an
>> easy way to avoid disagreements and avoid adding bylaws, committees
>> and bureaucracy.
>>
> Just to be clear: what are the documents you are talking about?
> If it is the documentation in GIT, then it falls
> under Postgres-XC Development Group copyright and is licensed as PostgreSQL
> license.
>

At least this is the license written physically inside GIT. But I might be
missing something as I am not a lawyer.
-- 
Michael Paquier
http://michael.otacoo.com