Re: [Postgres-xc-general] Cluster avaibility

[Magorn <ma...@gm...>]

On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Koichi Suzuki <koi...@gm...> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Running nodes while some of others don't work makes sense only for
> read only transaction.   Update transaction in such situation will end
> up with inconsistent database state.   This is basically why XC does
> not allow such situation.
>
> Please understand that node removal, which will be an issue beyond
> V1.0, should be done in consistent state, that is, all the node should
> be healthy at the removal operation.   If any of them fails, we need
> backup to fail over such nodes by streaming replication or other
> means.
>
> This is what we are assuming.
>
> I welcome any other ideas and proposals of features.   If it comes
> with a patch, this will accelerate the development.
>
> Regards;
> ----------
> Koichi Suzuki
>
>
Hi,
Thank's all for your answers.
I understand your point of view and the postgres-xc situation.
Sorry, but i can help you to write some patch ;) my C is not "fluent" but
i'll continue to follow the evolution of postgress-xc.
Regards,

-- 
Magorn