|
From: xiong w. <wan...@gm...> - 2010-11-16 06:31:59
|
Hi Koichi,
Thanks for your kindly notifications. I will pay more attention on
what you mentioned during my later work.
Thanks again.
Regards,
Benny
在 2010年11月16日 下午12:06,Koichi Suzuki <ko...@in...> 写道:
> Hi,
>
> I understand the idea. I'd just like to be a bit careful what should be
> nice to include as a temporary or a partial solution and what we should
> provide as a general solution. I understand this patch will be useful
> and people may not be confused.
>
> Cheers;
> ---
> Koichi
>
> (2010年11月16日 12:09), xiong wang wrote:
>> Dears,
>>
>> Thanks for your suggestions.
>>
>> I should clarify my idea.
>> 1)This patch is a temporary solution. It cann't really solve the
>> problem raised by updating on a partition column until the measure
>> that moving tuples from one node to another comes true.
>> It just forbids users to update on a partition column. Therefore, I
>> didn't consider too much because it will be deleted later.
>> 2)The patch forbids update on partition column on coordinators. It has
>> nothing to do with data nodes.
>>
>> If I misunderstand you, please let me know.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Benny
>>
>>> Hi,
>>
>>> I'm curious about two issues on this patch.
>>
>>> 1) Does it handle TOAST table correctly?
>>> 2) Does it handle SET clause such as SET key = key+1 ? Only a data node
>> can determine if such UPDATE statement make rows invalid to stay in the
>> data node. Unfortunately, data node is not equipped with distribution
>> key. To handle this correctly, data node has to handle TOAST table as
>>> mentioned in 1).
>>
>>> Regards;
>>> ---
>>> Koichi Suzuki
>>
>> (2010年11月15日 23:59), Mason Sharp wrote:
>>> On 11/15/10 5:13 PM, mei le wrote:
>>>> Dears,
>>>>
>>>> I am sorry. The bug#3107683.patch I commited before introduces a warning I didn't noticed. The enclosure is a new patch after I eliminated the warning.
>>>>
>>> Thanks. I just committed this and fixed a couple of other warnings that
>>> we had.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Mason
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Benny
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --- 10年11月12日,周五, Mason Sharp<mas...@en...> 写道:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 发件人: Mason Sharp<mas...@en...>
>>>> 主题: Fwd: [ postgres-xc-Bugs-3107683 ] UPDATE on partition column
>>>> 收件人: "Postgres-XC Developers"<pos...@li...>, "mei le"<lem...@ya...>
>>>> 日期: 2010年11月12日,周五,上午10:34
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Benny,
>>>>
>>>> I thought this might be one you might be interested in working on, too, if you have time.
>>>>
>>>> You could validate the update statement in pgxc_planner() if it is on a partitioned table.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Mason
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Subject:
>>>> [ postgres-xc-Bugs-3107683 ] UPDATE on partition column
>>>>
>>>> Date:
>>>> Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:29:56 +0000
>>>>
>>>> From:
>>>> SourceForge.net<no...@so...>
>>>>
>>>> To:
>>>> no...@so...
>>>>
>>>> Bugs item #3107683, was opened at 2010-11-11 21:29
>>>> Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by mason_s
>>>> You can respond by visiting:
>>>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1310232&aid=3107683&group_id=311227
>>>>
>>>> Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
>>>> including the initial issue submission, for this request,
>>>> not just the latest update.
>>>> Category: Database Server
>>>> Group: None
>>>> Status: Open
>>>> Resolution: None
>>>> Priority: 6
>>>> Private: No
>>>> Submitted By: mason_s (mason_s)
>>>> Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
>>>> Summary: UPDATE on partition column
>>>>
>>>> Initial Comment:
>>>> Until we support moving tuples from one node to another when the partition column of a table is updated, we should at least block this from happening. At the moment you can update it, and bad things can start happening as a result.
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> You can respond by visiting:
>>>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1310232&aid=3107683&group_id=311227
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Centralized Desktop Delivery: Dell and VMware Reference Architecture
>>>> Simplifying enterprise desktop deployment and management using
>>>> Dell EqualLogic storage and VMware View: A highly scalable, end-to-end
>>>> client virtualization framework. Read more!
>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-eql-dev2dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>>>> Pos...@li...
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mason Sharp
>>> EnterpriseDB Corporation
>>> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>>>
>>>
>>> This e-mail message (and any attachment) is intended for the use of
>>> the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. This message
>>> contains information from EnterpriseDB Corporation that may be
>>> privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable
>>> law. If you are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive
>>> this for the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution,
>>> retention, archiving, or copying of this communication is strictly
>>> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify
>>> the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message.
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
>> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2& L3.
>> Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great
>> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list
>> Pos...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers
>
>
|