From: Mason S. <mas...@en...> - 2010-05-26 16:57:18
|
If we do merge with 9.0, we still might want to merge in steps. to 8.4.4 first, then 9.0 to more easily catch any problems and hopefully make the 9.0 merge go more smoothly. Unless we need any particular 9.0 feature, I am not in any hurry to merge until 9.0 has gone GA. I like the idea of us working with a known stable base such that if we have a problem, we can be pretty sure it is in our code and not PostgreSQL. To be really paranoid, we could consider waiting until 9.0.1. Thanks, Mason Koichi Suzuki wrote: > Well, I think we should think more about merging to 9.0. > > ---------- > Koichi Suzuki > > > > 2010/5/26 Michael Paquier <mic...@gm...>: > >> Hi, >> >> PostgreSQL 8.4.4 has been released on the 17th. >> We didn't have any discussions about that yet, but it could be nice to do a >> code merge. >> Waiting for everybody's feedback. >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Michael Paquier >> NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND >> TELEPHONE CORPORATION >> NTT Open Source Software Center >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Postgres-xc-developers mailing list >> Pos...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers >> >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Postgres-xc-developers mailing list > Pos...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-developers > -- Mason Sharp EnterpriseDB Corporation The Enterprise Postgres Company This e-mail message (and any attachment) is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. This message contains information from EnterpriseDB Corporation that may be privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive this for the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution, retention, archiving, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. |