#68 add smarty capability to Postfixadmin

closed-accepted
nobody
Core (27)
5
2013-12-01
2009-03-25
Sebastian
No

This patch introduces the smarty template engine for Postfixadmin. First revision only changes templates for admin functionality, users will follow.

This first revision tries to be as close to the logic as before, therefore the templates are still ugly, but working.

Just apply diff against Postfixadmin 2.3rc2. Patch includes all smarty libraries, so no need to get them separately.

Gunzip and apply in main Postfixadmin directory: "patch -p1 < smarty_patch_rev1.diff"

Discussion

  • GingerDog

    GingerDog - 2009-03-25

    Hi,

    I'll look into possibly merging this in 2.3+.... If I merge it now, any 2.3 release will be pushed back by at least a month.

    I haven't yet had the chance to review the contents of the patch in detail....

     
  • Charles

    Charles - 2009-03-25

    Please don't merge it now... RC stage is NOT the time for stuff like this...

    :)

     
  • Sebastian

    Sebastian - 2009-03-25

    noproblem, it is'nt ready yet. Some additional revs will follow today.

    Maybe we can add a branch for this one, as it eases up the merging for 2.3+?

     
  • Charles

    Charles - 2009-03-25

    Oh... wait, missed the '+' in Davids comment... whew...

    I'm really looking forward to 2.3... lots of good stuff in it...

    Thanks guys!

     
  • Sebastian

    Sebastian - 2009-03-25

    Ok,

    here's the patch for all pages including users. Code was indented.

     
  • GingerDog

    GingerDog - 2009-04-18

    There is a postfixadmin-smarty branch which contains this patch.

     
  • Christian Boltz

    Christian Boltz - 2010-05-18

    SVN trunk includes smarty since months, therefore I think we can finally close this ticket ;-)

     
  • Christian Boltz

    Christian Boltz - 2010-05-18
    • status: open --> closed-accepted
     

Log in to post a comment.

Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:





No, thanks