Hello,
Am Sonntag, 1. Mai 2011 schrieb Ron Guerin:
> Was it a deliberate decision to only allow a one to one relationship
> between domains for aliasing purposes? I have one domain and 4
> aliased to it (I added the MySQL records by hand) and if it's not
> over my head I might try sending a patch in if the idea is
> acceptable. Otherwise I'm probably not going to bother changing the
> code for myself either.
I'm afraid I don't really understand your problem :-(
Therefore I'll give a short explanation about what is allowed for alias
domains.
It is no problem to have several domains (on the "from" side of the
alias) pointing to the same target domain, for example
foo.com -> example.com
bar.com -> example.com
However, a domain that is already used on the "to" side can't be used on
the "from" side of another alias domain. For example, if you have the
two alias domains listed above, you can't do
example.com -> foobar.com # not allowed
This is a restriction we intentionally included because it is the
easiest way to avoid loops.
If this does not answer your question, please send an example what you
manually had to add to the database so that I can understand your
problem.
Regards,
Christian Boltz
--
> Ich komme z.Zt. kaum noch mit dem Lesen der Listenmails nach.
> (Freundin ist schuld.)
Oh, hast du noch "Freundin 1.3"? Ab 2.0 beherrscht zumindest die
OS-Version Suspend-to-Disco und Suspend-to-MOM, teste die doch mal
an :-) Klappt hier ganz prima.
[> Ralph Müller und Michael Behrens in suse-linux]
|
