postfixadmin-devel

[Postfixadmin-devel] PostfixAdmin 2.3.2 ready for packaging

[Christian B. <pos...@cb...>]

Hello,

I've just checked in a changelog update and a new version number in the 
2.3.2 branch. This means the 2.3.2 release (aka SVN r858) is ready from 
my POV - no critical bugs left :-)

@all: please test the 2.3 branch if everything works.

@David: please create a tarball and the deb file and send it to me. I'll 
then create the RPM package and upload everything to SF.


Regards,

Christian Boltz
-- 
Das hätte man auch kürzer sagen können:
| "Please don't use evolution anymore. It's not intended as a
|  mailingprogramm, we're just riding around a little bit on our
|  C-Compilers to find out how to break the rules."
Yes, sir. Nice outlooks.      [Ratti in suse-linux]

Re: [Postfixadmin-devel] PostfixAdmin 2.3.2 ready for packaging

[Tanstaafl <tan...@li...>]

Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I've just checked in a changelog update and a new version number in the 
> 2.3.2 branch. This means the 2.3.2 release (aka SVN r858) is ready from 
> my POV - no critical bugs left :-)

What about the bug about Vacation removal not clearing out
notifications? I consider that a critical bug (maybe not ultra critical,
but important nonetheless)...

Otherwise... thanks to Christian and David (and everyone else who
contribs) for postfixadmin!

Re: [Postfixadmin-devel] PostfixAdmin 2.3.2 ready for packaging

[Christian B. <pos...@cb...>]

Hello,

Am Montag, 23. August 2010 schrieb Tanstaafl:
> Christian Boltz wrote:
> > I've just checked in a changelog update and a new version number in
> > the 2.3.2 branch. This means the 2.3.2 release (aka SVN r858) is
> > ready from my POV - no critical bugs left :-)

As you can see in my other mail: never say a release is ready before it 
was uploaded ;-)

SVN r860 is the new 2.3.2 - and I'll hopefully do the RPM packaging fast 
enough before someone finds another bug *g*

> What about the bug about Vacation removal not clearing out
> notifications? I consider that a critical bug (maybe not ultra
>  critical, but important nonetheless)...

The problem about this bug is that it needs some time for investigation, 
which I don't have at the moment [1]. Therefore I prefer to do a release 
with one missing bugfix over delaying the release for some weeks.

(As always: hints why the existing DELETE query doesn't work are 
welcome, patches even more ;-)


Regards,

Christian Boltz

[1] We have a "Weinfest" (wine festival) here in Insheim from friday 
    till monday, and I'm involved in planning, preparations etc. ...
-- 
Hochleistungswebspace
Das sind public-html-Verzeichnisse, die jeden Morgen zwanzig Liegestütze
machen, und mit Testosteron vollgepumpt sind.  [Markus Schaber]

Re: [Postfixadmin-devel] PostfixAdmin 2.3.2 ready for packaging

[Christian B. <pos...@cb...>]

Hallo,

You might have seen the following forum post:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/postfixadmin/forums/forum/676076/topic/3822301:

SQL injection:
https://psfx.domain.com/list-domain.php?username=ma...@ma...'

This was posted early enough - I did not upload the 2.3.2 release 
yet ;-)

I have fixed it in the 2.3 branch - please re-create the 2.3.2 tarball 
and .deb based on SVN r860.

Am Montag, 23. August 2010 schrieb David Goodwin:
> Not overly sure Evolution will gpg sign this correctly...

Looks good, however a *.asc file with a signature for each file (or for 
just the tarball if the .deb already includes a GPG signature) would 
probably be more useful IMHO.


Regards,

Christian Boltz
-- 
Swapping horses in the middle of a river... ah no the wrong citate...
changing package managers in the middle of a beta was a very bad
decision, specifically as it was not read for production use when
being introduced. [Ulrich Windl in opensuse]