Thread: [Postfixadmin-devel] Next release date?
Brought to you by:
christian_boltz,
gingerdog
From: Thomas T. <tho...@bl...> - 2016-03-25 14:40:21
|
Hi all, I was wondering if there is a date for a next release? The last version (2.3.8) is a while ago. Or can I use the trunk as a stable replacement? Thanks a lot in advance and best wishes, Thomas |
From: Christian B. <pos...@cb...> - 2016-03-28 09:30:21
|
Hello, Am Freitag, 25. März 2016, 15:22:21 CEST schrieb Thomas Trepper: > I was wondering if there is a date for a next release? The last > version (2.3.8) is a while ago. Or can I use the trunk as a stable > replacement? You can use 3.0 beta3 (= 2.93) or trunk - it probably has less bugs than 2.3.x and is stable ;-) The 3.0 final release will happen soon[tm], but I don't know the exact date yet. Regards, Christian Boltz -- Zwar sind CSS-Bugs kein Alleinstellungsmerkmal des Internet Explorers, jedoch beansprucht Microsoft seit vielen Jahren die Marktführerschaft. [Dirk Jesse auf http://www.highresolution.info/spotlight/entry/was_sie_ueber_css-frameworks_wissen_sollten/] |
From: Michael N. <ne...@ne...> - 2016-03-28 17:43:28
|
Hi Christian Can you tell us, what is still missing in order to declare a 3.0 release? It is already too late for the Ubuntu 16.04 LTS release, but it would be great if it would be released a couple of months before the Debian Stretch freeze so that we can get 3.x into it. Otherwise I fear we'll have to deal with Debian & Ubuntu carrying postfixadmin 2.3.7 for yet another 4-5 years. Release early. Release often Just a thought. Cheers Mike Am 28. März 2016 11:30:10 MESZ, schrieb Christian Boltz <pos...@cb...>: >Hello, > >Am Freitag, 25. März 2016, 15:22:21 CEST schrieb Thomas Trepper: >> I was wondering if there is a date for a next release? The last >> version (2.3.8) is a while ago. Or can I use the trunk as a stable >> replacement? > >You can use 3.0 beta3 (= 2.93) or trunk - it probably has less bugs >than >2.3.x and is stable ;-) > >The 3.0 final release will happen soon[tm], but I don't know the exact >date yet. > > >Regards, > >Christian Boltz >-- >Zwar sind CSS-Bugs kein Alleinstellungsmerkmal des Internet Explorers, >jedoch beansprucht Microsoft seit vielen Jahren die Marktführerschaft. >[Dirk Jesse auf >http://www.highresolution.info/spotlight/entry/was_sie_ueber_css-frameworks_wissen_sollten/] > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Transform Data into Opportunity. >Accelerate data analysis in your applications with >Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. >Click to learn more. >http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785471&iu=/4140 >_______________________________________________ >Postfixadmin-devel mailing list >Pos...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postfixadmin-devel -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. |
From: Christian B. <pos...@cb...> - 2016-03-28 19:36:47
|
Hello, Am Montag, 28. März 2016, 19:24:17 CEST schrieb Michael Neuffer: > Can you tell us, what is still missing in order to declare a 3.0 > release? Not too much. Quick (and maybe incomplete) summary: - test the "multiple server support" patch we received via github, and decide if it is good enough to go into 3.0 - make sure SVN and github are in sync - have some free time to do that ;-) Time is the biggest problem - I spent quite some time on the AppArmor tools recently and want to finish a patch series there before I can get back to PostfixAdmin. Oh, and my day job also needs me. (Sorry, I can't split or clone myself ;-) > It is already too late for the Ubuntu 16.04 LTS release, but it would AppArmor did a beta release just some days ago for 16.04, so maybe you can still submit PostfixAdmin 3.0 beta (+ a patch with SVN changes since the release)? (I don't know the Ubuntu deadlines or the release schedule, so please check yourself.) > be great if it would be released a couple of months before the Debian > Stretch freeze so that we can get 3.x into it. Otherwise I fear we'll > have to deal with Debian & Ubuntu carrying postfixadmin 2.3.7 for yet > another 4-5 years. If you don't want to submit 3.0 beta, can you at least upgrade them to 2.3.8? > Release early. Release often > Just a thought. Yes, I know ;-) Feel free to use 3.0 beta3 (= 2.93) - just ignore the beta label ;-) Judging on the download numbers, a lot of people do this [1], and the number of bugreports we receive it is _very_ low. Regards, Christian Boltz [1] ~1400 downloads of 2.93 _per week_? Really? :-) For comparison: 2.3.8 has ~250 weekly downloads. -- I appreciate what you're trying to do - the Rules of OpenSuSE say that the project has to have at least one KDE3 vs KDE4 flamewar per quarter, and at least one KDE vs GNOME mudwrestling match a year. [Will Stephenson in opensuse-factory] |