[Postfixadmin-devel] Bug in v3.0 vacation module

[Ullrich v. B. <uz...@mu...>]

Good evening!

I wasn't able to open a ticket so here is a small diff that fixes a problem
with the vacation module. It references a table column that seems to have
existed in older versions, but does no longer in version 3. I'm using this
package from the web site: postfixadmin-3.0.fedora.noarch.rpm

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- VacationHandler.orig	2016-05-22 18:17:46.000000000 +0200
+++ VacationHandler.php	2016-12-13 15:50:18.664179212 +0100
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
             'body'          => pacol(   1,          1,      0,      'text', 'pUsersVacation_body'           , ''                                , '' ),
             'activefrom'    => pacol(   1,          1,      1,      'text', 'pUsersVacation_activefrom'     , ''                                , '' ),
             'activeuntil'   => pacol(   1,          1,      1,      'text', 'pUsersVacation_activeuntil'    , ''                                , '' ),
-            'cache'         => pacol(   0,          0,      0,      'text', ''                              , ''                                , '' ), # leftover from 2.2
             'active'        => pacol(   1,          1,      1,      'bool', 'active'                        , ''                                 , 1 ),
             'created'       => pacol(   0,          0,      1,      'ts',   'created'                       , ''                                 ),
             'modified'      => pacol(   0,          0,      1,      'ts',   'last_modified'                 , ''                                 ),
@@ -180,7 +179,6 @@
             'active' => db_get_boolean(true),
             'activefrom' => $activeFrom,
             'activeuntil' => $activeUntil,
-            'cache' => '',
         );

         // is there an entry in the vacaton table for the user, or do we need to insert?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I hope it is ok to post it here. If not, please let me know.

There seems to be a another problem with display of date strings in a few
places, which I will have to investigate.

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz...@mu...
Encrypted email preferred                          PGP Key-Id: 29D93B10