Re: [Postfixadmin-devel] Using the 'Real Name' in the autoreply message
Brought to you by:
christian_boltz,
gingerdog
From: Tanstaafl <tan...@li...> - 2013-04-03 13:10:53
|
On 2013-04-02 3:45 PM, Christian Boltz <pos...@cb...> wrote: > Am Freitag, 29. März 2013 schrieb Tanstaafl: >> My question is, is this code included in any of the formal stable >> releases (2.3.5? 2.3.6?)? If not, will it make it into the next stable >> release (presumably 2.3.7)? >> >> Or is this only in the new 3.x trunk? > The 2.3 branch is in maintenance mode (bugfixes only), which means 2.3.x > won't get the new vacation.pl features. > > On the positive side, SVN trunk (which will become 3.0) is quite stable. > Everything in the web interface should work (if not, report a > bugreport), and the CLI is also getting better (I deleted (!) ~500 > lines to complete the create and update commands yesterday ;-) - the > other commands may or may not work). > > I even found some time to handle some long-standing TODOs yesterday ;-) > (see the commit mailinglist for details) > > In other words: feel free to use SVN trunk ;-) Well, I really try to avoid installing things outside of my package manager (portage/gentoo), as I am far from expert at these things... I'll go open an update/bump request for SVN trunk - but if it is really that stable, why not make an official release, at least for the one with the web based interface (thats all I and many people use anyway)? > BTW, while looking at the random (really!) signature: > I'm still looking for someone who can shorten the changelog from 2.3.x > to current SVN trunk - are you interested? ;-) (My current draft with > 370 lines is probably too long for the average user ;-) Depends on what you mean by 'shorten the changelog'? If you mean edit it/clean the text up, I would be happy to help, but being that I'm not a coder, I'm not sure I'd know exactly what/how to clean it up. If you mean back-porting things from SVN trunk to 2.3 branch, would love to, but again - I'm not a coder... :( Thanks Christian for the response... |