Hello,
Am Sonntag, 30. Oktober 2011 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 30.10.2011 00:33, schrieb Christian Boltz:
> > Am Samstag, 29. Oktober 2011 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> >> Am 26.10.2011 13:42, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> > If you don't use the "desctiption" field, you could enter the
> > transport information there - that's currently the easiest way I
> > can imagine.
> hm , cant see some desctiption field but i am not at the latest stable
> version of postfixadmin....., or i am too dummy to find just right
> now *g
Looks like I had the domain forms/table in mind when answering ;-)
It's the "Name" field in the create/edit mailbox form.
> > Adding a field to the database and the code isn't too difficult,
> > but 2.3.x is in bugfix-only mode and otherwise more or less a
> > dead horse. In other words: Investing time in adding a field to
> > 2.3.x only makes sense if you really need it _now_.
>
> sombody from the list, answered me offlist
> that they did modifiacation allready ,and are in testing mode
> so having a tmp workaround , i can wait for releasing this
OK.
> however, feel free to ask for help, testing etc
> the worst you can get is a "no" *g
;-)
Regards,
Christian Boltz
--
Mein Spamassassin läuft überhaupt nicht. Trotzdem wurden in evolution
beachtliche Mengen Spam gefiltert - weil anscheinend diverse zuliefernde
Mailserver Spamassassin verwenden und den X-Spam Header setzen. Mein
eigener Spamassassin steht seit einem Jahr in der Ecke, dreht Däumchen
und lacht sich 'nen Ast. [Ratti in suse-linux]
|