|
From: Valkum <va...@go...> - 2010-06-26 09:14:53
|
Am 26.06.2010 11:10, schrieb reg9009: > Am 23.06.2010 00:49, schrieb Christian Boltz: > >> Hello, >> >> good news: we are near the 2.3.1 release [1] - at least that's what I >> think ;-) >> >> The code is not bug-free (probably it will never be), but all major bugs >> should be fixed. (And of course there will always be someone saying that >> his "favorite" bug is still unfixed ;-) >> >> Missing parts: >> - merge debian/* changes from r805 -> normes? hello? ;-) >> - testing - I did not even test the code after the merge I commited some >> minutes ago ;-) >> >> Still very important: >> >>> @everybody: Please checkout the 2.3 branch from SVN and check if >>> everything works. Especially check if everything listed in the >>> CHANGELOG.txt works ;-) >>> >> @GingerDog: >> Notes regarding the release: >> a) version an revision numbers in changelog and functions.inc.php need >> to be updated >> b) Please send me the tarball in advance so I can create a RPM package >> _before uploading to SF_. >> The reason for this request is the "latest files" section on SF, >> which makes uploading the RPM later a no-go :-/ - we have to upload >> everything at once. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Christian Boltz >> >> [1] if we manage to do the release before someone finds another major >> bug *g* >> >> > Hi all, > > we are planning to introduce some kind of Object Relational Mapper to > manage the database stuff. I think there were some discussions about it > earlier. Anyway, we wanted to give Doctrine Project a final try. This > would theoretically extend the RDBMSs support without any further > intervention (e.g. Oracle, etc.). Any thoughts on this? > > Regards, > Sebastian > I think this is a good idea. In this way we can build up a manage librarie and develop some frontends like the web front end and the console frontemd. So the web FE and the Lib should be fully standalone or so. greetz Rudi |
