RE: [Portableaserve-discuss] Changes commited, Release increased to 1.2.12c

[John D. <de...@ma...>]

>
>The MCL implementation is quite similar to the CMUCL one. I think the
>cleanest and most efficient approach seems to be something like
>LispWorks' Timers. Spawning a whole thread for each timer is not the
>best thing for the scheduler I assume.

I'm not sure how else to do it. Maybe John or Gary have some 
suggestions -- I'm pretty new to MCL.

I can reproduce John's problem here, but I'm not sure what to do about it yet.

Best,

John DeSoi, Ph.D.