Menu
▾
▴
pombase-curation-tool — Canto curation tool issues
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(112) |
Jun
(256) |
Jul
(398) |
Aug
(117) |
Sep
(191) |
Oct
(101) |
Nov
(355) |
Dec
(47) |
|---|
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-05 10:21:11
|
Curation tool item #3545823, was opened at 2012-07-19 04:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3545823&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Open >Resolution: Later Priority: 2 Private: No Submitted By: Midori Harris (gomidori) Assigned to: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Summary: make email address changes propagate Initial Comment: A possible feature to think about; not urgent request: have email address changes made in the 'edit person details' page take effect throughout the tool long-winded explanation: Back in the mists of time, someone created a user entry for Ryoko, but left the '.uk' off her email address. I fixed it by editing the 'Details for' page*, but the change hasn't propagated elsewhere. Specifically, when I click on the 'enter this curation session' link for any session not yet 'in progress', I see the name and email address boxes as expected, but the email box shows the old, uncorrected version (example at **). This may be inconsequential, but might be a little annoying for Ryoko, because she may think she has to fix it again every time. For future community use, it'll probably be very useful to have email changes affect sessions assigned to the person -- people sometimes move, typos creep in, etc. *http://curation.pombase.org/pombe/view/object/person/23?model=track **http://curation.pombase.org/pombe/curs/a0099c7e3471a313 cheers, m ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-05 02:21 Message: keeping open ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 03:28 Message: We should build this into the new item features ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3545823&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-05 09:48:08
|
Curation tool item #3590085, was opened at 2012-11-26 06:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by antonialock You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3590085&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Private: No Submitted By: Antonia Lock (antonialock) Assigned to: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Summary: Cannot add comment in reviewal mode Initial Comment: when in /ro mode, a comment cannot be added, even though the option is there. I asked a researcher to take a look at my annotations and he tried to use this function but the comments weren't stored. I tried to do the same but got stuck on the 'cogwheel' animation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Antonia Lock (antonialock) Date: 2012-12-05 01:48 Message: I don't mind if you remove the comment option however I mind that they will think they can add comments when they cannot ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-05 01:24 Message: I keep the email I have sent out to somebody in a pending file until they respond. I don't think its difficult to keep a track of people we have asked to review sessions individually for now. Eventually it might be useful to have a list in the tool with status "pending review by author" though.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-12-04 20:44 Message: They might not actually click on "finish reviewing". They might just delete the window/tab and email you. You might need to keep track of who you have sent review links to in case people forget to "finish reviewing" and forget to reply by email. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-04 04:13 Message: I don't think we need an e-mail every time a comment is added (we are talking about annotation specific comments), we only need an e-mail alert when they click "finish reviewing", we would go to the session and see if they had added any comments to specific annotations. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Antonia Lock (antonialock) Date: 2012-12-04 02:04 Message: I don't think we want it to be editable but at the moment it looks like comments can be added. I don't think it is necessary to spawn emails once comments have been added? I have only sent out /ro sessions for community to check my annotations (or possibly any alterations I have made to theirs)....they would not have access to this link out of context? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-12-03 14:16 Message: Do we want the review page to be editable? If they can add comments they could come back and add more at any time. You would need to get an email alert for each comment they added so you knew it had happened. It might be better to allow the user to reactivate the session, do all their changes, then "Submit to curators" again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 03:32 Message: Putting the [priority of this, would be useful to enable as currently community having to send their feedback in a spreadsheet..... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3590085&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-05 09:24:45
|
Curation tool item #3590085, was opened at 2012-11-26 06:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3590085&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Private: No Submitted By: Antonia Lock (antonialock) Assigned to: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Summary: Cannot add comment in reviewal mode Initial Comment: when in /ro mode, a comment cannot be added, even though the option is there. I asked a researcher to take a look at my annotations and he tried to use this function but the comments weren't stored. I tried to do the same but got stuck on the 'cogwheel' animation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-05 01:24 Message: I keep the email I have sent out to somebody in a pending file until they respond. I don't think its difficult to keep a track of people we have asked to review sessions individually for now. Eventually it might be useful to have a list in the tool with status "pending review by author" though.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-12-04 20:44 Message: They might not actually click on "finish reviewing". They might just delete the window/tab and email you. You might need to keep track of who you have sent review links to in case people forget to "finish reviewing" and forget to reply by email. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-04 04:13 Message: I don't think we need an e-mail every time a comment is added (we are talking about annotation specific comments), we only need an e-mail alert when they click "finish reviewing", we would go to the session and see if they had added any comments to specific annotations. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Antonia Lock (antonialock) Date: 2012-12-04 02:04 Message: I don't think we want it to be editable but at the moment it looks like comments can be added. I don't think it is necessary to spawn emails once comments have been added? I have only sent out /ro sessions for community to check my annotations (or possibly any alterations I have made to theirs)....they would not have access to this link out of context? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-12-03 14:16 Message: Do we want the review page to be editable? If they can add comments they could come back and add more at any time. You would need to get an email alert for each comment they added so you knew it had happened. It might be better to allow the user to reactivate the session, do all their changes, then "Submit to curators" again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 03:32 Message: Putting the [priority of this, would be useful to enable as currently community having to send their feedback in a spreadsheet..... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3590085&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-05 04:44:49
|
Curation tool item #3590085, was opened at 2012-11-26 06:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kim_rutherford You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3590085&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Private: No Submitted By: Antonia Lock (antonialock) Assigned to: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Summary: Cannot add comment in reviewal mode Initial Comment: when in /ro mode, a comment cannot be added, even though the option is there. I asked a researcher to take a look at my annotations and he tried to use this function but the comments weren't stored. I tried to do the same but got stuck on the 'cogwheel' animation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-12-04 20:44 Message: They might not actually click on "finish reviewing". They might just delete the window/tab and email you. You might need to keep track of who you have sent review links to in case people forget to "finish reviewing" and forget to reply by email. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-04 04:13 Message: I don't think we need an e-mail every time a comment is added (we are talking about annotation specific comments), we only need an e-mail alert when they click "finish reviewing", we would go to the session and see if they had added any comments to specific annotations. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Antonia Lock (antonialock) Date: 2012-12-04 02:04 Message: I don't think we want it to be editable but at the moment it looks like comments can be added. I don't think it is necessary to spawn emails once comments have been added? I have only sent out /ro sessions for community to check my annotations (or possibly any alterations I have made to theirs)....they would not have access to this link out of context? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-12-03 14:16 Message: Do we want the review page to be editable? If they can add comments they could come back and add more at any time. You would need to get an email alert for each comment they added so you knew it had happened. It might be better to allow the user to reactivate the session, do all their changes, then "Submit to curators" again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 03:32 Message: Putting the [priority of this, would be useful to enable as currently community having to send their feedback in a spreadsheet..... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3590085&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-04 12:18:37
|
Curation tool item #3592098, was opened at 2012-12-03 06:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3592098&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: remove requirement to log-in from test tool Initial Comment: For the high level pages of the live tool http://curation.pombase.org/ you don't need to be logged in but in the test tool, for the equivalent page you do can you make it so you don't so we can test the txt is visible when not logged in http://curation.pombase.org/test ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-04 04:18 Message: OK, from this page: http://curation.pombase.org/test/local/pombase_front_page we get to a page which doesn't say "test" all over it http://curation.pombase.org/local/curate_a_paper should it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-12-03 14:37 Message: Sorry, I should have mentioned that you can get to the top level pages from here in the test tool: http://curation.pombase.org/test/local/pombase_front_page ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 06:09 Message: actually it seems that the current high level pages are not implemented in test, because when I log in I go directly tot eh admin page from ths URL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3592098&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-04 12:13:55
|
Curation tool item #3590085, was opened at 2012-11-26 06:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3590085&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Private: No Submitted By: Antonia Lock (antonialock) Assigned to: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Summary: Cannot add comment in reviewal mode Initial Comment: when in /ro mode, a comment cannot be added, even though the option is there. I asked a researcher to take a look at my annotations and he tried to use this function but the comments weren't stored. I tried to do the same but got stuck on the 'cogwheel' animation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-04 04:13 Message: I don't think we need an e-mail every time a comment is added (we are talking about annotation specific comments), we only need an e-mail alert when they click "finish reviewing", we would go to the session and see if they had added any comments to specific annotations. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Antonia Lock (antonialock) Date: 2012-12-04 02:04 Message: I don't think we want it to be editable but at the moment it looks like comments can be added. I don't think it is necessary to spawn emails once comments have been added? I have only sent out /ro sessions for community to check my annotations (or possibly any alterations I have made to theirs)....they would not have access to this link out of context? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-12-03 14:16 Message: Do we want the review page to be editable? If they can add comments they could come back and add more at any time. You would need to get an email alert for each comment they added so you knew it had happened. It might be better to allow the user to reactivate the session, do all their changes, then "Submit to curators" again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 03:32 Message: Putting the [priority of this, would be useful to enable as currently community having to send their feedback in a spreadsheet..... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3590085&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-04 12:07:51
|
Curation tool item #3592417, was opened at 2012-12-04 04:07 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3592417&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: text changes to "you are about to start curating page" Initial Comment: The page which people arrive at when they are sent an e-mail to curate a session takes them to the page "You are about to start curating data from this paper" (image uploaded so you know which page) This page needs a few changes to integrate with the new workflow 1. Remove the "Please enter your e-mail details from this page "we will already have the first author details recorded, and they will have an option to change the "curator" from this page and all subsequent ones 2. Change the continue button to "start curating" 3. Add a link "Documentation Introduction" 4. Add an option to "change curator page".... (this will be the page which is linked to from the section added at the top of every gene page, described yesterday in https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3592082&group_id=65526&atid=2525791 https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/pombase/wiki/SessionAssignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3592417&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-04 11:58:58
|
Curation tool item #3592414, was opened at 2012-12-04 03:58 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3592414&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: small text changes to CANTO "gene" page Initial Comment: 1. Curation panel box "blue header bar" could we add a little mouse over "H"/help icon with the text "These are the types of data you can annotate. Follow a link for more detailed instructions" 2. Remove the Amigo and biogrid icons from this location (we decided they weren't very useful 3. Keep the PomBase one but give it a "mouse over" text Go to *genename* genepage in PomBase ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3592414&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-04 10:04:22
|
Curation tool item #3590085, was opened at 2012-11-26 06:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by antonialock You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3590085&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Private: No Submitted By: Antonia Lock (antonialock) Assigned to: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Summary: Cannot add comment in reviewal mode Initial Comment: when in /ro mode, a comment cannot be added, even though the option is there. I asked a researcher to take a look at my annotations and he tried to use this function but the comments weren't stored. I tried to do the same but got stuck on the 'cogwheel' animation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Antonia Lock (antonialock) Date: 2012-12-04 02:04 Message: I don't think we want it to be editable but at the moment it looks like comments can be added. I don't think it is necessary to spawn emails once comments have been added? I have only sent out /ro sessions for community to check my annotations (or possibly any alterations I have made to theirs)....they would not have access to this link out of context? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-12-03 14:16 Message: Do we want the review page to be editable? If they can add comments they could come back and add more at any time. You would need to get an email alert for each comment they added so you knew it had happened. It might be better to allow the user to reactivate the session, do all their changes, then "Submit to curators" again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 03:32 Message: Putting the [priority of this, would be useful to enable as currently community having to send their feedback in a spreadsheet..... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3590085&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-03 22:37:02
|
Curation tool item #3592098, was opened at 2012-12-03 06:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kim_rutherford You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3592098&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: remove requirement to log-in from test tool Initial Comment: For the high level pages of the live tool http://curation.pombase.org/ you don't need to be logged in but in the test tool, for the equivalent page you do can you make it so you don't so we can test the txt is visible when not logged in http://curation.pombase.org/test ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-12-03 14:37 Message: Sorry, I should have mentioned that you can get to the top level pages from here in the test tool: http://curation.pombase.org/test/local/pombase_front_page ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 06:09 Message: actually it seems that the current high level pages are not implemented in test, because when I log in I go directly tot eh admin page from ths URL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3592098&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-03 22:16:45
|
Curation tool item #3590085, was opened at 2012-11-26 06:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kim_rutherford You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3590085&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Private: No Submitted By: Antonia Lock (antonialock) Assigned to: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Summary: Cannot add comment in reviewal mode Initial Comment: when in /ro mode, a comment cannot be added, even though the option is there. I asked a researcher to take a look at my annotations and he tried to use this function but the comments weren't stored. I tried to do the same but got stuck on the 'cogwheel' animation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-12-03 14:16 Message: Do we want the review page to be editable? If they can add comments they could come back and add more at any time. You would need to get an email alert for each comment they added so you knew it had happened. It might be better to allow the user to reactivate the session, do all their changes, then "Submit to curators" again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 03:32 Message: Putting the [priority of this, would be useful to enable as currently community having to send their feedback in a spreadsheet..... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3590085&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-03 15:51:26
|
Curation tool item #3549162, was opened at 2012-07-26 07:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3549162&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Private: No Submitted By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: internal error 109/ various Initial Comment: This was definately caused by having the session open in 2 windows happened when selecting phenotype term curs/45dd89cc4951b51a/annotation/edit/12/phenotype#c=FYPO%3A0001214&s=sensitito+potas Gene: spt7 Questions? Contact curators ... Internal error DBIx::Class::ResultSet::delete(): DBI Exception: DBD::SQLite::st execute failed: database is locked [for Statement "DELETE FROM cursprop WHERE ( ( ( curs = ? AND type = ? ) AND curs = ? ) )"] at lib/PomCur/Track/StatusStorage.pm line 109 There has been an internal error. The problem has been logged and will be investigated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 07:51 Message: Same error here: transferred from https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3564994&group_id=65526&atid=2525791 I tried to edit a phenotype annotation to add a condition, and it all seemed to go fine until I hit 'add', and got this: Internal error DBIx::Class::ResultSet::delete(): DBI Exception: DBD::SQLite::st execute failed: database is locked [for Statement "DELETE FROM cursprop WHERE ( ( ( curs = ? AND type = ? ) AND curs = ? ) )"] at lib/PomCur/Track/StatusStorage.pm line 109 Error There has been an internal error. The problem has been logged and will be investigated. It's http://curation.pombase.org/pombe/curs/982304b134332abd/annotation/process_alleles/18 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 07:41 Message: transferring from https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3561245&group_id=65526&atid=2525791 I have never seen this before I was adding the MF GO:0016887 to curs e73b6293989d19a9 and got: Internal error DBIx::Class::ResultSet::delete(): DBI Exception: DBD::SQLite::st execute failed: database is locked [for Statement "DELETE FROM cursprop WHERE ( ( ( curs = ? AND type = ? ) AND curs = ? ) )"] at lib/PomCur/Track/StatusStorage.pm line 109 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-11-26 18:07 Message: I still don't know how this could happen except when the ontology update runs at stupid o'clock. I'll keep thinking. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3549162&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-03 15:50:51
|
Curation tool item #3588620, was opened at 2012-11-19 15:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3588620&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 3 Private: No Submitted By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: internal error...known cause "double clicking" Initial Comment: I had an internal error a couple of times today. I managed to reproduce it. It is caused by "double clicking" uploading message screenshot. Just in case anyone else has reported it as a sporadic error at any point..... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 07:50 Message: I'll close this and reopen with the specific error if it happens again ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 03:22 Message: low priority as not a big problem ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3588620&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-03 15:48:22
|
Curation tool item #3586807, was opened at 2012-11-13 13:18 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3586807&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Assigned to: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) >Summary: firefox bug: letters in allele description don't appear Initial Comment: Has anyone else noticed this?: when you type an allele name in this is much slower then normal typing speed, in fact sometimes the letters appear in a different order then you type them, and sometimes letters are missing (I *know* this sounds exactly like my normal typing, but really it is differetn!). I have to slow typing right sown to make sure each letter appears as planned (It might be only when I am using wireless at home though...) val ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-11-29 02:46 Message: Ah, thanks. I didn't think to try Firefox. I'll do that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-11-28 08:41 Message: A little bit more info. For me this only happens for the allele name field, but not for the allele description field. There is a little spinning icon which appears at the end of the field, presumably to indicate that the last character you entered is still "processing" in some way. If you type anything whilst this icon is spinning, it does not get entered, but this means that you need to type at snails pace. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Midori Harris (gomidori) Date: 2012-11-28 08:08 Message: I don't think I've seen this ... which may add evidence for the browser-specificity hypothesis, since I usually use canto in Safari. m ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-11-28 04:26 Message: Antonia suggested this could be browser specific, (we are both using FF) v ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Antonia Lock (antonialock) Date: 2012-11-28 03:50 Message: this happens to me pretty much all the time ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-11-28 02:00 Message: I've tried to reproduce this and failed. It would be handy to have an example of a session ID and allele name where you see this happen. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-11-26 04:11 Message: I'm raising this as currently it is really really easy to introduce errors into allele names and not notice. I've had a couple of instances with a long allele name which had a character missing and then had to edit them all to fix ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Antonia Lock (antonialock) Date: 2012-11-15 01:07 Message: Actually; I am 100% certain I get this when I type allele names and conditions I am less certain I get this on normal term searches (as judged by last days curation) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Antonia Lock (antonialock) Date: 2012-11-13 14:12 Message: I get this too, but I also get it where you type in term names, or conditions. (Should have reported it but never got around to it, it's tricky to explain and can't exactly screenshot it). Another thing I sometimes get is that the conditions dropdown gets 'stuck' on the page, and gets attached to the top left of the screen (it disappears on loading another page). I will try and screenshot this next time it happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3586807&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-03 15:46:54
|
Curation tool item #3564994, was opened at 2012-09-05 05:26 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3564994&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 2 Private: No Submitted By: Midori Harris (gomidori) Assigned to: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Summary: bug: error editing phenotype Initial Comment: I tried to edit a phenotype annotation to add a condition, and it all seemed to go fine until I hit 'add', and got this: Internal error DBIx::Class::ResultSet::delete(): DBI Exception: DBD::SQLite::st execute failed: database is locked [for Statement "DELETE FROM cursprop WHERE ( ( ( curs = ? AND type = ? ) AND curs = ? ) )"] at lib/PomCur/Track/StatusStorage.pm line 109 Error There has been an internal error. The problem has been logged and will be investigated. It's http://curation.pombase.org/pombe/curs/982304b134332abd/annotation/process_alleles/18 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 07:46 Message: see https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3549162&group_id=65526&atid=2525791 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 03:34 Message: will raise if we have another occurence ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-11-11 08:43 Message: please raise if/when this happens again ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Midori Harris (gomidori) Date: 2012-09-07 04:25 Message: Will do. I think I submitted this ticket pretty soon after it happened, if that helps at all. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-09-07 04:23 Message: This is one of the "I don't know how that can happen" problems. If you see it again, could you email me directly and I'll investigate it straight away. I'm more likely to be able to solve it that way. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Midori Harris (gomidori) Date: 2012-09-05 05:27 Message: rather oddly, when I went back to the paper summary page, the annotation was there and edited as I intended ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3564994&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-03 15:41:46
|
Curation tool item #3561245, was opened at 2012-08-24 03:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3561245&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Antonia Lock (antonialock) Assigned to: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Summary: Error message when adding MF/ bug Initial Comment: I have never seen this before I was adding the MF GO:0016887 to curs e73b6293989d19a9 and got: Internal error DBIx::Class::ResultSet::delete(): DBI Exception: DBD::SQLite::st execute failed: database is locked [for Statement "DELETE FROM cursprop WHERE ( ( ( curs = ? AND type = ? ) AND curs = ? ) )"] at lib/PomCur/Track/StatusStorage.pm line 109 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 07:41 Message: transferred to https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3549162&group_id=65526&atid=2525791 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-11-26 18:05 Message: If this was very early in the day (before 6:30am) it was probably because the ontology update was running. I've moved the update to a bit earlier to avoid that. It it wasn't early in the day, I'll a bit stumped. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-08-24 03:14 Message: This is the same error as: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3549162&group_id=65526 It's one of the "it shouldn't be possible" sort of problems. I'll look into it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3561245&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-03 15:41:09
|
Curation tool item #3549162, was opened at 2012-07-26 07:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3549162&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Private: No Submitted By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: internal error /improve error message for 2 open sessions Initial Comment: This was definately caused by having the session open in 2 windows happened when selecting phenotype term curs/45dd89cc4951b51a/annotation/edit/12/phenotype#c=FYPO%3A0001214&s=sensitito+potas Gene: spt7 Questions? Contact curators ... Internal error DBIx::Class::ResultSet::delete(): DBI Exception: DBD::SQLite::st execute failed: database is locked [for Statement "DELETE FROM cursprop WHERE ( ( ( curs = ? AND type = ? ) AND curs = ? ) )"] at lib/PomCur/Track/StatusStorage.pm line 109 There has been an internal error. The problem has been logged and will be investigated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 07:41 Message: transferring from https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3561245&group_id=65526&atid=2525791 I have never seen this before I was adding the MF GO:0016887 to curs e73b6293989d19a9 and got: Internal error DBIx::Class::ResultSet::delete(): DBI Exception: DBD::SQLite::st execute failed: database is locked [for Statement "DELETE FROM cursprop WHERE ( ( ( curs = ? AND type = ? ) AND curs = ? ) )"] at lib/PomCur/Track/StatusStorage.pm line 109 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-11-26 18:07 Message: I still don't know how this could happen except when the ontology update runs at stupid o'clock. I'll keep thinking. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3549162&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-03 15:36:03
|
Curation tool item #3587527, was opened at 2012-11-15 06:38 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3587527&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Antonia Lock (antonialock) Assigned to: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) >Summary: quick: replace option to add annotations diff. conditions Initial Comment: Once you have added a phenotype annotation, you can edit the allele but the tickbox for 'add a new annotation with a different set of conditions' has disappeared. This means that if you want to add in another annotation with a new set of conditions you need to start all over. This is a bit annoying. perhaps it won't be with the power-user interface, but even though it is not quite 'as intended' I don't think it does any harm to reimplement the tickbox? (I know you are officially in an 'editing' mode....but it's not like it is confusing is it? I miss this function!) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-11-26 04:12 Message: would be good to get this back ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3587527&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-03 15:32:06
|
Curation tool item #3545822, was opened at 2012-07-19 03:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3545822&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 1 Private: No Submitted By: Midori Harris (gomidori) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: new session doesn't have status Initial Comment: This is a small thing, but I noticed it, so here ya go ... I assigned PMID:2908246 to Ryoko, and created a curation session, also assigned to her. Almost everything looks fine, but the curation session status column is blank everywhere All the other sessions I assigned to Ryoko have a status; the new ones say SESSION_CREATED. I don't see how the session could exist without being created, and I don't remember doing anything differently this time compared to when I set up the other sessions. Am I just being a numpty? m ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 07:32 Message: I think there is a way for this to happen but I forget what it is. Putting at low proiority as it might be made moot by the coming changed, but we'll "up" if it happens again ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-07-19 04:11 Message: I'll have a look at the code to see if I can work out how that could happen. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Midori Harris (gomidori) Date: 2012-07-19 04:00 Message: oops, meant to include which session it is ... it's 8d5360c7df27d542 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3545822&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-03 15:20:16
|
Curation tool item #3582250, was opened at 2012-10-31 08:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3582250&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 3 Private: No Submitted By: Antonia Lock (antonialock) Assigned to: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Summary: Limited number of rows displayed on add allele page? Initial Comment: I added 12 alleles to one phenotype. On the summary page only 11 were displayed. I therefore entered the 12th one again but it wasn't displayed. Then I clicked through to the 'you have made the following annotations, do you want to add an extension/ comment' page, here the 12th allele was displayed (twice, because I had made the annotation twice). Is there a max of 11 rows displayed on the add allele summary page? the annotation in question is SPAC23H3.13c gpa2 T49A(T49A) FYPO:0000683 constitutive catalytic activity Reporter gene assay Not specified and the session is http://curation.pombase.org/pombe/curs/e806e3afc4cc7fc0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 07:20 Message: lowering, increase if it happens again and post web console error ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-11-15 17:17 Message: Thanks Antonia. One thing that might help is to use the "web console" to watch for warnings and errors that the browser reports. Normally if the browser spots a problem it quietly ignores it and doesn't tell the user but these warnings and errors can be helpful for debugging. They show up in the "web console" in firefox. You can view it using the menu: Tools -> Web Developer -> Web Console. You don't need to leave it open all the time, but it could be useful to open it before doing curation and clear the console - there's a clear button in the top right. You can leave it closed after that. If you notice a problem with the allele adding, could you open the web console and let me know what error and warnings have been logged? If you ever feel like using Chrome or Safari, they have a console too. Let me know if you like a pointer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Midori Harris (gomidori) Date: 2012-11-15 09:15 Message: I think this is what I reported in SF 3555742 ... in the case I noticed, it would only show two alleles in Safari, but more in Firefox. Anyway, I closed the other item. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3555742&group_id=65526&atid=2525791 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-11-07 14:50 Message: This is a bit tricky to debug. Next time it happens, could you try reloading the allele adding page? I'm curious to know if the alleles appear when you do that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Antonia Lock (antonialock) Date: 2012-11-07 07:28 Message: I have had this bug again I added 4 phenotypes to session a46da3af971de4e3, these don't show on the allele summary page but do show when I go through to add a comment/extension, see screenshots. I have had this once before ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3582250&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-03 15:13:11
|
Curation tool item #3567747, was opened at 2012-09-14 07:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3567747&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 8 Private: No Submitted By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: quick: paper with 2 PMIDs???? Initial Comment: This paper Fission yeast Lem2 and Man1 perform fundamental functions of the animal cell nuclear lamina. Gonzalez Y, Saito A, Sazer S. Nucleus. 2012 Jan-Feb;3(1):60-76. appears to have 2 Pubmed IDs the one I have annotated PMID:22156749 and PMID:22540024 I have added a triage comment to PMID:22540024 so hopefully it will not get "recurated" I guess at some point this will be fixed, so we might need to transfer the anntations over ??? or something? hopefully they will keep the first ID val ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 07:13 Message: 22156749 now comeds up as Wrong UID 22156749 so I think Pubmed must have noticed and fixed this. Could you change the PMID of session PMID:22156749 to PMID:22540024? (and migrate curation session) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3567747&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-03 15:08:41
|
Curation tool item #3589604, was opened at 2012-11-24 03:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3589604&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None >Priority: 1 Private: No Submitted By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Assigned to: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Summary: Streamline the publication, triage and sessions stuff Initial Comment: Antonia: "actually, there might not be time for this at the moment but it would be really nice if the interface 'behind the scenes' (adding publications, triaging, assigning sessions etc) was a bit more streamlined" We need to talk about what we need to do to make it better. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 07:08 Message: we will open a new item for any specific interface changes once the new proposals are implemented ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-11-26 03:32 Message: We do need to do this, but I'm hoping a lot of it will happen naturally as we start using these procedures. reducing the priority of this and we'll raise and extend one the high priority items to make community curation easier are done. We can manage for a while. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3589604&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-03 15:06:11
|
Curation tool item #3547630, was opened at 2012-07-23 07:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3547630&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Changes to labs and people Initial Comment: WE decided that in the curation tool we don't want to maintain connections between peopl and labs. We already have a number of examples of people curating papers from ex-labs, people curating papers they were not authors on. This will be come confusing and we think it is better that we collect the detailed lab info (lab/interests/lab members etc) from a separate interface attached to pomBase somehow. What we need in the curation tool is i) the originating lab for the paper (probably this will replace the current publication curator slot) ii) who actually curated the paper. (we do not think we necessarily need to connect these 2 pieces of information, this will be much more flexible) Add lab 1. People no longer need to be connected to labs (drop people interface) 2. Labs will be known be lab head surname only (use first name to disambiguate if common surname) 3. In this interface should also be able to assign a PMID to a lab, 4. If PMID supplied is not in database supply message "paper needs adding (or similar) Add Person 1. For a new person we don't need to assign to a lab (drop this) In the publication details 1. Change the "assign to curator" to "originating lab" The Edit pub 1. Change the pulldown to autocomplete (from lab list) In the Triage interface change the "assign to curator" to "set originating lab" (autocomplete from lab list) (I'll set this at 6, slightly lower than the other stuff, as we can manage, Skype M or me if you need any clarification) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 07:06 Message: Newer item will replace this. We will need to revisit changes to the interface for adding people, buyt most of this should be covered by the revisions ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-07-26 04:59 Message: transferring from https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3538483&group_id=65526&atid=2525791 : not particularly urgent, but I was adding a new curator and got an error message, (i didn't copy the message it but easily reproducible) I realise afterwards this is because the person I was trying to add was already added as a curator, so a more elegant message (if you enter an exact name of an existing person ask to confirm existing e-mail, or similar) (This may longer be relevant after the changes in this item, but if it is it should be addressed with this re-work) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-07-23 23:02 Message: This sounds fine to me. Everyone? Kim FYI We envisaged pushing the user data collection over to be an interface on PomBase (i.e Mark). The community maintain their own data, it will load directly into Chado, with minimal curator intervention. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Date: 2012-07-23 20:51 Message: If the lab is always "Joe Bloggs' Lab" we can probably ditch the labs altogether. What I mean is, the publication could just have a field like "Originating lab head", which is just a person. That way we just maintain a list of people. That simplifies the database and means the triage page is easy to fix. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-07-23 09:40 Message: I'm not totally sure that this will still be relevant after the above changes but this is transferred from https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3480224&group_id=65526&atid=2525791 Currently when assigning a publication to a curator there is a static list. We need an easy way of adding a new user to the list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-07-23 07:21 Message: Currently to find out who actually did the curation you need to go into the session. It would be nice if that appeared in the session tables. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-07-23 07:19 Message: We think to speed up we will also want to "create a session" for all curatable papers when they are assigned as "curatable". we could then assign a curator whist triaging. We can come back to this later though....not urgent ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-07-23 07:12 Message: Note there are some mistakes in the existing lab list.... (probably best to clear and start again, as there are not many labs in the list yet). I also have some mistakes in this list (when I was adding it seemed as though I was correcting these but some of the old entries have been retained http://curation.pombase.org/pombe/view/list/lab?model=track Forsburg Paul Nurse and duplicate rows for Bahler (1) suplicate rows for Nurse (4) Can you fix these, or tell me how to. -------- Once this is done the curators will go through and assign labs to the completed sessions (Midori volunteered) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3547630&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-03 15:03:50
|
Curation tool item #3528750, was opened at 2012-05-21 20:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3528750&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Assigned to: Kim Rutherford (kim_rutherford) Summary: Add a front page on curation.pombase.org Initial Comment: We need to create a front page for: http://curation.pombase.org Val's initial text is on the wiki: https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/pombase/wiki/CantoFrontPageText Please modify that and then update this tracker item when it's ready to implement. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 07:03 Message: replaced by revised item ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-11-23 04:43 Message: So, it seems that the only outstanding part of this ticket, is 1: to stop multiple sessions being spawned? I think your solution sounds fine as a start, becasue it shouldn't happen very often, as we won't have many new sessions in progress..... 2: Delete the duplicate session I created here: http://curation.pombase.org/pombe/view/object/pub/9070?model=track (maybe check that no other publications have 2 sessions open simultaneously and prevent this? 3. Once this is done, allow users to access these pages without being logged in (they will provide their details subsequently bu at present they cant get beyond the log in page to see instructions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3528750&group_id=65526 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-03 14:09:16
|
Curation tool item #3592098, was opened at 2012-12-03 06:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by val_wood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3592098&group_id=65526 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: remove requirement to log-in from test tool Initial Comment: For the high level pages of the live tool http://curation.pombase.org/ you don't need to be logged in but in the test tool, for the equivalent page you do can you make it so you don't so we can test the txt is visible when not logged in http://curation.pombase.org/test ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Valerie Wood (val_wood) Date: 2012-12-03 06:09 Message: actually it seems that the current high level pages are not implemented in test, because when I log in I go directly tot eh admin page from ths URL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=2525791&aid=3592098&group_id=65526 |
22 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.