In the old tool:
Existing GO biological process annotation from PMID:10908327
In the new tool:
New GO molecular function annotations from this session Add ...
No annotations yet
Existing GO biological process annotations
yada
We should definitely change this to "from PMID:10908327"
as they are existing from the publication, not necessarily from the session.
I also wonder if the "types" with no data should be visible at first. This gives the user 2 options of what to do which could be confusing.
We could make these links with no annotation appear after one curation has been added maybe?
Diff:
Should this be on the new and existing headers, or just the existing/Chado table?
I've added "for PMID:1234567" to the new and existing headers for now. Easy to change though.
https://github.com/pombase/canto/commit/87390db9372a79d4770b746fb0cf21d8e88bd481
Diff: